Chefelf.com Night Life: Citizen-X - Viewing Profile

Jump to content

Citizen-X's Profile User Rating: -----

Reputation: 0 Neutral
Group:
Former Members
Active Posts:
21 (0 per day)
Most Active In:
Debate Club (8 posts)
Joined:
03-May 05
Profile Views:
2,074
Last Active:
User is offline May 29 2005 11:36 PM
Currently:
Offline

Previous Fields

Country:
Australia
Icon   Citizen-X has not set their status

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: Venting frustration...

    Posted 22 May 2005

    I saw the film, and, well, I liked it to some degree. Although I think the ending was too rushed. For example taking all these quick shots of what is happening everywhere, from Alderaan, to Padmes funeral, to Vader and the Emperor on the starboard deck, and then finally to Tatooine, too many scenes not very well organised and too quick.

    And when I saw Vader on that Starboard deck I had this conflicting feeling like I was watching Empire Strikes Back or something, its like the clash of films, OT meets PT, it felt weird in a bad way sort of like it didnt belong there, it would be better if they were standing in Imperial City on a balcony or something, in the coruscant night looking up into the sky as stardestroyers depart on theyre journeys.

    Other than that, yes theyre was problems with the dialogue, and emotion in the relationships between the characters. And the Noooooooooooo, killed the mood.

    QUOTE
    saw it yesterday and Anakins turn is my biggest issue. Basically, he goes in a few seconds from "What have I done?" to "Yes my master, the jedi shall be slaughetered."


    Yes it was odd, but I guess I would say that Anikan was reassured by Palpatine at that moment, and Anikan probably realised that now he had no choice, because the damage was done, Mace Windu was dead. Also add to that his constant brainwashing by Palpatine.

    ALSO I HAVE TO ASK, WHERE WAS MON MOTHMA? WAS SHE EVEN IN THE MOVIE? DID I MISS HER? IF SHE WAS PLEASE TELL ME IN WHICH SCENE?
  2. In Topic: Glorification of the Crusades

    Posted 19 May 2005

    QUOTE
    Considering most hollywood stars are jew's, it's kind of dumb to say they can't play non-jewish roles.


    I disagree, there are many White, Christian actors that would suite this role perfectly and out of them all they chose a Jew to play the lead role of a Christian Crusader. Also the fact that Bloom isn't really a good actor (not even relating to his Jewishness) brings the whole thing down. Using Bloom was just another tool for propaganda.
  3. In Topic: THE NEW POPE

    Posted 18 May 2005

    QUOTE
    It got tolerance and common sense?


    Common sense? laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

    Tolerance has no place for Europe, well not the one your thinking of anyway, and most traditional Europeans know that.

    EUROPE FOR THE EUROPEANS!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!
  4. In Topic: THE NEW POPE

    Posted 18 May 2005

    QUOTE
    MC, I'm embarrased to say that up until recently I knew nuthin' about Poland. To me, it was just another of those countries in eastern europe that I can't remember the location of


    Thats right you do know nothing of Poland. As most Poles see it, The Catholic Church is the only thing thats keeping the country together, and with the slow rise of Right Wing parties biggrin.gif , it will be the icing on the cake. If only Germany and the rest of Euroupe thought like that, Jeez!!! wat happened to Deutschland sad.gif
  5. In Topic: Glorification of the Crusades

    Posted 18 May 2005

    QUOTE
    The stupid thing is how little religion actually played in this film. The ending speech by Orlando Bloom, if it happened back then, would have cost him his head. It's all white washed liberal crap. "it's not about God or religion, it's about being yourself and loving you, you need to find the strength in you and fight the bad guys, who are in fact not that bad, just misunderstood".


    Ohh ye!!!! Of course I forgot, yeah, I was kinda confused when he said that (well he is a Jew dry.gif ), then I realised that it was just another ploy of propaganda thats trying to bring tensions between Muslims and Christians to good terms. And I doubt Christians, let alone noble Knights thought that way. As I see it if he had said that in real life, the rest of those crusaders would most have definetly swiped his head of, and accused him of HERETIC!!!! ! or somethn.

    QUOTE
    the movie made the muslims out to be so noble while the 'religous' freak crusaders were evil and blood thirsty. Oh wait, some crusaders like the muslims and vice versa.


    Yes again, I also noticed that. I think they were all quite even in that sense, both raped, pillaged, and killed. And the film doesnt really balance it on both sides, instead leans on one. And I rekon in that department The Saracens would probably out do the Christians, since Theyre Religion promotes it. (damn Arabs dry.gif )

    QUOTE
    people's favorite past time is to rant about how evil crusaders were, yet over look the fact that moor conquers did a shit load of damage too.


    Hell ya!!!! like they tried to take over Euroupe numerous occations, on theyre so called "Jihads", But still Europeans kiked their ass, and showed them who is the true master of Euroupe biggrin.gif

    And why the hell did they cast Bloom!!!! he's not even Christian!!! let alone a terrible actor, he's a Jew. Thats probably the reason why this movie went downhill probably because its been co-created by Jewish Hollywood. I bet if it was made by Europe it would definetly be better.

My Information

Member Title:
New Cop
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender

Contact Information

E-mail:
Click here to e-mail me
Website URL:
Website URL  http://