Jane Sherwodd does not supress. She stabs. That's why I like her.
King removed boob shot of Madeleine Thursday June 24, 2004
#47
Posted 25 June 2004 - 08:58 AM
#48
Posted 25 June 2004 - 09:40 AM
princess Madeleine Nieuwstraten
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#50
Posted 25 June 2004 - 10:10 AM
JM's official press secretary, scientific advisor, diplomat and apparent antagonist?
#52
Posted 25 June 2004 - 10:26 AM
1) According to the article, the webiste included the caption "Oh so cute, Oh so horny."
2) That's a nice dress, if you're a whore. Not a princess.
3) The website contains links to a political cartoon, ad for private sex parties, and of course hard core pornography.
4) When you are king of Sweden, you get to do things like sue newspapers for showing off your daughter's lack of good judgement.
5) Yes she is cute, and seems to have a good body. But is she? Does she? Judge for yourselves: http://www.princess-madeleine.com/
6) And Jane, please: there's nothing wrong with ogling young women. When they are old won't they won't look back in anger at all the ogling they enjoyed. And while we're at it, there's nothing wrong with jerking off a few times about it either. Or hell, calling up strangers and pretending they're Princess Madeleine, maybe asking them whether they have that dress on. What's the harm? We've all done it!
#54
Posted 25 June 2004 - 12:06 PM
yeah she is a hottie too, i dont believe that really though...sorry i just think its hard to miss two things each the size of her head when she only has one head, may i reiterate...wowza
#55
Posted 25 June 2004 - 12:45 PM
Civ2: You don't really think that, do you? That's a kickass dress, and if I was as gorgeously endowed as the princess, I would wear it at all times, including breakfast, errands, and royal functions. I'm just delighted to see someone with a royal title wearing something fashionable and flattering. And, for the record, I don't find it to be slutty at all -- I mean, unless it was sold with a note pinned, "Wear exclusively while leaning over in order to maximize cleavage." In which case, it's a little slutty.
My feelings on the picture were best expressed in a conversation I had with K1ngwarren right after he posted it. My feeling is, if I were the king, I would congratulate my daughter for having a great rack and excellent fashion sense, and then I would congratulate myself for being the progenitor of aforementioned rack and fashion sense.
#56
Posted 25 June 2004 - 01:37 PM
I'll vouch for that.
Oh yes, if I'm truly pissed off I will say something about it...I still remember that "comment" you made, Chyld.
(*narrows eyes*)
This post has been edited by Jane Sherwood: 25 June 2004 - 01:40 PM
Chyld is an ignorant slut.
- Campbell Bean (David Tennant), Takin' Over the Asylum, 1994
#58
Posted 25 June 2004 - 05:03 PM
Civ2: You don't really think that, do you? That's a kickass dress, and if I was as gorgeously endowed as the princess, I would wear it at all times, including breakfast, errands, and royal functions.
Hey Jen,
I don't know what sort of couple you and Chef make, but since I've seen a picture of him, you must be pretty damn cute to make true that assessment about the couple and the what not. Insert preferred emoticon here. I don't know what I think of Barend getting that close to my future wife with his George Lucas avatar. Bad dreams have I will.
As for the question, I can't tell how serious you are, so I'll answer: no. I don't think there's anything wrong with the dress. Like you say, it's just an unfortunate photo, and it should noy have made its way onto a hardcore porn site. I think if you read all the way to the bottom of my post, you should get an idea how serious a mood I was in when I wrote it.
However, if you check out the site I found, you'll not that she tends to cover up a little more than that. I don't know what function that was she wore that dress for, but I figure she was either trying to distract the poeple from another burdensome new tax, or she was husband shopping.
This post has been edited by civilian_number_two: 25 June 2004 - 06:21 PM
#60
Posted 25 June 2004 - 07:37 PM
I notice the picture has perfect dimensions for a poster. Time to fire up the ol' image editor!