stephen king stephen king is the best
#3
Posted 23 November 2003 - 08:03 AM
I read a lot of books (and some Stephen King) in high school. I have really matured over the years so now I much prefer something a little more intellectual like playing video games instead.
See Chefelf in a Movie! -> The People vs. George Lucas
Buy the New LittleHorse CD, Strangers in the Valley!
CD Baby | iTunes | LittleHorse - Flight of the Bumblebee Video
Chefelf on: Twitter | friendfeed | Jaiku | Bitstrips | Muxtape | Mento | MySpace | Flickr | YouTube | LibraryThing
Buy the New LittleHorse CD, Strangers in the Valley!
CD Baby | iTunes | LittleHorse - Flight of the Bumblebee Video
Chefelf on: Twitter | friendfeed | Jaiku | Bitstrips | Muxtape | Mento | MySpace | Flickr | YouTube | LibraryThing
#4
Posted 23 November 2003 - 09:25 AM
I actually read my first Stephen King novel while I was in college -- Carrie was on the syllabus for my class on American Gothic (an intriguing but oft-times bizarre examination of the role of horror in shaping the American national pysche).
Stephen's been in the news lately: http://www.cnn.com/2...lbookawards.ap/
Stephen's been in the news lately: http://www.cnn.com/2...lbookawards.ap/
#8
Posted 23 November 2003 - 07:44 PM
The first Stephen King book I read was The Shining. This is still by far and away my favourite of his books. I've read most, with the exception of a couple of the most recent. I found that devoting what spare time I do have to reading just King was making me a far to well adjusted individual so I put him aside to ground myself with Gemmell, Feist and Eddings among others.
Luminous beings are we... not this crude matter.
Yoda
Yoda
#10
Posted 24 November 2003 - 05:03 AM
I read CARRIE and MISERY, but only because I'd seen the films and had liked them. Which, in retrospect, shows that as a youth I was less critical because CARRIE the movie is hillariously goofy. Anyway, there's nothing too terrible about the books; I even liked the stuff in MISERY that never made it into the movie, about the writing process and the novel-within-the-novel. Some of the details I felt might have been a little mean-spirited, like the way the novelist's self-proclaimed "number one fan" only reads his books once they've come out on paperback. I don't think King is ready to acknowledge just how much money real *fans* have spent to put him in the life he enjoys, which frankly is ignorant and insulting.
Anyway, those novels are ok without actually being any good. Granted, he's writing thrillers, and there's not a lot of competion for a genre that's really seen as a jump-off point for a screenplay. When you read a King novel, you're really just reading a long story treatment, complete with crosscutting and an emphasis on dialogue. There's little to distinguish them from the b-movies that they become, so while I agree that it's snobbish to make a big deal about having never read a King novel (or a Grisham, or a Chrichton, or whatever), it's also ridiculous to try to elevate them to the level of serious art. They're pulp, and some pulp is pretty good. That's as much praise as they merit.
Mike.
Anyway, those novels are ok without actually being any good. Granted, he's writing thrillers, and there's not a lot of competion for a genre that's really seen as a jump-off point for a screenplay. When you read a King novel, you're really just reading a long story treatment, complete with crosscutting and an emphasis on dialogue. There's little to distinguish them from the b-movies that they become, so while I agree that it's snobbish to make a big deal about having never read a King novel (or a Grisham, or a Chrichton, or whatever), it's also ridiculous to try to elevate them to the level of serious art. They're pulp, and some pulp is pretty good. That's as much praise as they merit.
Mike.
"I had a lot of different ideas. At one point, Luke, Leia and Ben were all going to be little people, and we did screen tests to see if we could do that." -George Lucas, in STAR WARS: the Annotated Screenplays (p197).
#11
Posted 24 November 2003 - 02:37 PM
I was the same with Carrie, read it because the movie was good. However, I've read a few others, I tried to follow the Green Mile series, but missed a few until I got the book that has all of them in one. Dreamcatcher was okay, but sort of boring. Thinner was pretty cool, but I think I was just into it because that dude got shot in the hand with a slingshot. That was funny.
#13
Posted 24 November 2003 - 07:44 PM
the only stephen king thing i've read is 'the running man'
i can't belive that clown had someone do a mini-series remake of 'the shining'
Stanley Kubrics version is my second favorite film of all time.
i can't belive that clown had someone do a mini-series remake of 'the shining'
Stanley Kubrics version is my second favorite film of all time.
>>The Adventures of Heinrich Von Bastard<< (A Web Comic)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#15
Posted 24 November 2003 - 07:48 PM
first of all, dreamcatcher was cool. and yes the gunslinger series is awesome. i've only read the first one and a few chapters of the next. whenever i have enough money to buy one, i forget all about it. gunsling was actually the first story he started writing. it took him ten years to finish it.
Thirteen and a half.
Twelve jurors,
one judge,
and half a chance.
Twelve jurors,
one judge,
and half a chance.