Chefelf.com Night Life: Georgia House Bans Genital Piercings - Chefelf.com Night Life

Jump to content

Crappy News Forum

This is a REPLY ONLY form. Only Crappy News Moderators can post news topics here. Anyone is free to reply to the news topics. It's the Crappy News Forum, where everyone's a winner!

Page 1 of 1

Georgia House Bans Genital Piercings Thursday, March 25, 2004

#1 User is offline   K1NGWARREN Icon

  • Devil Boss
  • PipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 216
  • Joined: 20-November 03
  • Country:Nothing Selected

Posted 25 March 2004 - 01:10 AM

QUOTE
Georgia House Bans Genital Piercings
Thursday, March 25, 2004

ATLANTA (AP) -- Genital piercings for women were banned by the Georgia House Wednesday as lawmakers considered a bill outlining punishments for female genital mutilation.

The bill would make such mutilation punishable by two to 20 years in prison. It makes no exception for people who give consent to have the procedure performed on their daughters out of religious or cultural custom.

An amendment adopted without objection added "piercing" to the list of things that may not be done to female genitals. Even adult women would not be allowed to get the procedure. The bill eventually passed 160-0, with no debate.

Amendment sponsor Rep. Bill Heath, R-Bremen, was slack-jawed when told after the vote that some adults seek the piercings.

"What? I've never seen such a thing," Heath said. "I, uh, I wouldn't approve of anyone doing it. I don't think that's an appropriate thing to be doing."
 
The ban applies only to women, not men. The bill has already been approved by the Senate but now must return to that chamber because of the piercing amendment. Both chambers of the Legislature must agree on a single version of a bill before it can go to the governor for final approval.

http://customwire.ap...N=ENTERTAINMENT


In other news, Christina Aguilera has cancelled the Atlanta show on her world tour.
0

#2 User is offline   Chefelf Icon

  • LittleHorse Fan
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 4,528
  • Joined: 30-October 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York, NY
  • Country:United States

Posted 25 March 2004 - 08:34 AM

Welcome to America: Where you are told what you can and can't do with your own genitals.
See Chefelf in a Movie! -> The People vs. George Lucas

Buy the New LittleHorse CD, Strangers in the Valley!
CD Baby | iTunes | LittleHorse - Flight of the Bumblebee Video

Chefelf on: Twitter | friendfeed | Jaiku | Bitstrips | Muxtape | Mento | MySpace | Flickr | YouTube | LibraryThing
0

#3 User is offline   Heccubus Icon

  • Ugh.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Head Moderator
  • Posts: 4,954
  • Joined: 30-October 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:Canada

Posted 25 March 2004 - 10:04 AM

But men can still have theirs done, which is even more disturbing than the female piercing to begin with.
0

#4 User is offline   WalrusOfPlastic Icon

  • Not Greg
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 234
  • Joined: 07-November 03
  • Location:Detroit
  • Country:United States

Posted 25 March 2004 - 04:44 PM

Why! What is the possible reasoning other than they think it's gross?

Man, if I was a woman I'd go to Georgia and get it done, just to challenge such an absurd decision.

Ridiculous. Infuriating.

This post has been edited by WalrusOfPlastic: 25 March 2004 - 04:44 PM

0

#5 User is offline   jyd Icon

  • Mini Boss
  • PipPip
  • Group: Junior Members
  • Posts: 196
  • Joined: 23-February 04
  • Location:NJ

Posted 25 March 2004 - 05:10 PM

Atlanta Airport has a reputation for being very fast, they did not want to lose this due to all these things setting off metal detectors.
0

#6 User is offline   barend Icon

  • Anchor Head Anchor Man
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 11,839
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nieuw Holland
  • Interests:The Beers of Western Europe, Cognac, and constantly claiming the world would have been a better place if Napoleon had won.
  • Country:Australia

Posted 25 March 2004 - 09:13 PM

i'm sure enough votes will have it amended to allow for piercings.

i think it's inhumane that people have their daughters "circumsised"
so i give a thumbs up to that descision.
I'm sorry but I don't care what religeon you are or how old it is! forced supression of other people without permission or through threat of violence is wrong.

besides which, I think women have enough trouble finding someone to satisfy them, without it being a medical imposibility.
0

#7 User is offline   Laura Icon

  • Brother Redcloud
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 578
  • Joined: 30-October 03
  • Location:Boston
  • Interests:gnome habits
  • Country:United States

Posted 26 March 2004 - 01:11 PM

If I understand you correctly, barend, you object to body modification performed on children without their consent for the sole reason of tradition. But the law is about so much more than that; it prevents adult women (and ONLY women, mind you) from making decisions about what they want to do with their body. It actively REMOVES rights that women previously had for <i>no reason</i>. No health concern is mentioned, so it is not for the women's own sake (though that would be contraversial too), and it does not affect anybody but the woman herself.

This law sets an alarming precedent. If they can make this kind of trivial decision for women, soon they'll be forbidding them from wearing what they want to wear, taking the jobs they want, being seen by doctors or going out in public without a husband or father. Fuck Georgia!
0

#8 User is offline   barend Icon

  • Anchor Head Anchor Man
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 11,839
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nieuw Holland
  • Interests:The Beers of Western Europe, Cognac, and constantly claiming the world would have been a better place if Napoleon had won.
  • Country:Australia

Posted 29 March 2004 - 12:52 AM

yes they are a backward bunch...

from the looks of it it was a mistake, but know one should have explained it to him... prudish old inbred fart!!!

but I don't think you can get a warrent to check someones genitals for a metal stud... there's no way they can enforce it.
0

#9 User is offline   Jordan Icon

  • Tummy Friend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,161
  • Joined: 31-October 03
  • Location:Mars
  • Interests:I have none.
  • Country:Ethiopia

Posted 29 March 2004 - 03:09 AM

If they are going to pass a law like that, apply it to both men and women. Genital piercings could be a good way to rekindle the erotic flare between a married couple, who has no doubt got a little tired of the same old style.

Maybe they could argue that piercings could be beneficial for the couples, and as a result, decrease the amount of divorces???? Could work

I would never do it, i would resort to dildos over piercings, but that's just me.

This post has been edited by Jordan: 29 March 2004 - 03:19 AM

Oh SMEG. What the smeggity smegs has smeggins done? He smeggin killed me. - Lister of Smeg, space bum
0

#10 User is offline   barend Icon

  • Anchor Head Anchor Man
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 11,839
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nieuw Holland
  • Interests:The Beers of Western Europe, Cognac, and constantly claiming the world would have been a better place if Napoleon had won.
  • Country:Australia

Posted 29 March 2004 - 08:56 AM

presonally, I don't mind peircings, but even nipple rings seem a little intrusive and obstructive. but then again i've never been with a girl with peircings so who knows, I might like it...

and this from someone who wants a death ray cannon attatched to his chest.
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  • Decrease editor size
  • Increase editor size