[Icey]

I can't believe no one has said anything about the pecker garlic. I'd think that's a huge huge thing. None of it really shocked me at all, except for the garlic thing, that was just so big and shocking!

What's he trying to fend off? Vampiric pornstars?

[Deepsycher]

I can't believe no one has said anything about the pecker garlic. I'd think that's a huge huge thing. None of it really shocked me at all, except for the garlic thing, that was just so big and shocking!

What's he trying to fend off? Vampiric pornstars?

Yes, good for vampires but I read some years ago at a Vampire Institute site that such people did exist from a disease and some unsuccessful opposites to zombies. I think they said that the garlic allergies were proven false in some tests they did (need to check again,) and now very rare cases of vampires and zombies exists. Perhaps there are still many cases, where they are being contained in locations that are hidden.

Imagery: "I suppose nowadays the poor people are replaced as the zombies, whilst the vampires live at the top."

I thought you said "pepper garlic," but do not know what is so big and shocking about garlic.
In soup it is good for me.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 20 April 2006 - 11:50 AM

[barend]

not pepper garllic... pecker garlick

DAMNIT EDIT: i should read ALL the posts before being witty....

This post has been edited by barend: 20 April 2006 - 05:02 PM

[Deepsycher]

not pepper garllic... pecker garlick

DAMNIT EDIT: i should read ALL the posts before being witty....

Which is why I said:

"I thought you said "pepper garlic," but do not know what is so big and shocking about garlic.
In soup it is good for me."

I never heard of pecker garlick so I do not know what it means, as for confirming and pointing out, could you explain?

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 20 April 2006 - 05:07 PM

[barend]

yeah, well, oh well... crap/

people are always repeating my posts anyway...

[Deepsycher]

Oh shall I not state quotes?

For someone working at 75, perhaps they were also desperate to find someone that was agreeable to the pay at the time.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 20 April 2006 - 08:51 PM

[J m HofMarN]

Pecker garlic, by definition, is garlic that goes on one's pecker. You figure it out.

I feel stupider for having had to explain that...

And I'm a firm believer in garlic's beneficial properties as well, but never thought to put it down there. But then again if the guy's still rocking the casbah at that age... -Looks both ways, grabs a few cloves and shoves them down my pants-

Also, I've repressed the memories of everything DS said on the last page, but I know it was effing crazy. Something back there is getting quoted when I have the strength to subject myself to it again.

[Cobnat]

For someone working at 75

Hes fucking post-teens at the age of 75... I would hardly call that "working".

[Deepsycher]

Pecker garlic, by definition, is garlic that goes on one's pecker. You figure it out.

I feel stupider for having had to explain that...

And I'm a firm believer in garlic's beneficial properties as well, but never thought to put it down there. But then again if the guy's still rocking the casbah at that age... -Looks both ways, grabs a few cloves and shoves them down my pants-

Also, I've repressed the memories of everything DS said on the last page, but I know it was effing crazy. Something back there is getting quoted when I have the strength to subject myself to it again.

Garlic that people eat, I know that, which was why I said "In soup it is good for me."

This is how I learn, by asking questions, there are some "things" I do not know, it is not "stupid" for me to learn it, might be if I don't, I do not think it makes you "stupid" for answering my questions, I see it as "helpful."

Effing crazy:

Craziness out of something, everybody could be crazy and not know it or see it, depending on perspectives.

At least, do ask what you do not know before quoting.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 April 2006 - 12:12 PM

[J m HofMarN]

Ok then, fair enough. I'll ask one major question before I go to select my next DS quote:

What in the eff is wrong with you?

[Deepsycher]

I am getting that you see something wrong, do state.
So I can say why or change what might be wrong in appearance.

I cannot say what is wrong with me if I cannot not see it.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 April 2006 - 01:00 PM

[J m HofMarN]

I can't even explain all of it. Anyone else want to field this?

The best I can come up with would be the immortal words of Nicholas Cage in Con-Air.

"What's wrong with him?"

"My first guess would be: A lot."

[Deepsycher]

I can't even explain all of it. Anyone else want to field this?

The best I can come up with would be the immortal words of Nicholas Cage in Con-Air.

"What's wrong with him?"

"My first guess would be: A lot."

What is classed as wrong?

There could be so many issues with people who appear normal from the outside but not from the inside.

Some people could appear not normal from the outside, but appear normal in the inside, also varying from place to place. What perspectives indicate the opposing normalities, to the point that not everybody is the same in that way, and certainly not a "cold" headed robot as they may seem.


So "what is wrong with him?" " a lot" but what kinds of "things" are "wrong" ?

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 April 2006 - 10:06 PM

[barend]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Deepsycher]

Getting back to the subject, is there another word to describe these people instead of "stars?"