[Deepsycher]

Hey, let ME say why my threads exist, eh? Ah, screw it. I can't talk Dee into thinking anything.

I am seeing is negativity from CoffMon and Floppy Discuit at the moment, who assume other people as if they are right, too busy on this than the actual subject.

I do not know it all, I like to learn from other people as well, until I come across those who cannot tolerate others who may appear in another way, which they describe as A robot. Shows the negativity and ignorance.

Perhaps they might have been bullied at some institute in a similar way but physically. Maybe using excuses not to look, to state their ignorant points at people. "I do not like that person, he irritates me, ban him." In sequence to "I know it all, forget it, he is stupid and lets class him as annoying, so we can have him banned." Now that is an issue towards coping with other kinds of people. I have not done much wrong, just asserting myself.

Rather put assumptions and negativity on people rather than looking and asking questions about the subject. I am the one looking at the subject and they are the ones making the negativity. Simply I am not going budge, you have an issue with someone, do discuss personally.

Can we get back to the subject here?

Ah another thought, what if the tissues were loaded with something, and it got mixed up with the same type of tissues on delivery, as if they are waiting for something. Just checking that.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 17 April 2006 - 02:45 PM

[floppydisk]

I just noticed this... FD didn't propose that idea...

Unless you mean the idea that he was quoting, because I'm pretty sure I came up with the robot idea...

And following Floppy Discuit's unrandom idea of a robot.

Does that mean I'm right?

Hey, let ME say why my threads exist, eh? Ah, screw it. I can't talk Dee into thinking anything.

I can't talk to Dee for very much longer and still be able to think.

[Deepsycher]

Unless you mean the idea that he was quoting, because I'm pretty sure I came up with the robot idea...
Does that mean I'm right?
I can't talk to Dee for very much longer and still be able to think.

No, I said "unrandom idea", fixed idea of classing me as a robot, it seems.

Simply I can think normally, personally I would prefer to settle the issue, satisfactory on both sides without negative thoughts.

Issue:

"I can think, you cannot think."
Some of your posts I read (Not here) "You can think, I cannot think."

The structure of the language, remember, does not mean I am a robot. (I know I repeat.)

Maybe a language barrier exists between, to look for.

Scaling down any negativity may help for a start.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 17 April 2006 - 03:04 PM

[barend]

Not sure what you mean about hypothetaperbole.

I was stating the possible causes behind similar to how you said "I think there was obviously something deeper going on." If that is true, perhaps they fear if their activities are exposed it won't look good compared to running out of toilet tissue.

to explain long after the event:

"I think there was obviously something deeper going on."
"I think there was obviously something deep-sych-er going on."


as for hypothetaperbole: a proccess of over annalytical misappropriated extrapolative discourse serving as a diversion to the less recessive focal point of the original subject matter.

(yes... i assembled it from other words, but it is fully functional)

[Otal Nimrodi]

Oh, now you're making Dee blush!

[Deepsycher]

to explain long after the event:

"I think there was obviously something deeper going on."
"I think there was obviously something deep-sych-er going on."
as for hypothetaperbole: a proccess of over annalytical misappropriated extrapolative discourse serving as a diversion to the less recessive focal point of the original subject matter.

(yes... i assembled it from other words, but it is fully functional)

A joke from the name.

Analytical, dishonest, estimation of formal speech, serving as a detour or attention to the less active focus point of the subject matter?
I need to estimate and ask questions, does not mean I am dishonest, I try to focus on most points I can think of which works sometimes on trying to understand from mosy possibilities, also works well for me for predicting the end of films.

Oh, now you're making Dee blush!

To go red?
I am not red.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 17 April 2006 - 06:08 PM

[barend]

i never said you were 'dishonest'

just disruptive to main focus.


distracting.

i don't know where you got dishonest from.


unless it was from the unsavory conetations affiliated with 'missapropration' which i was using in a technical manner rather than it's socially affiliated one.

[Deepsycher]

i never said you were 'dishonest'

just disruptive to main focus.
distracting.

i don't know where you got dishonest from.
unless it was from the unsavory conetations affiliated with 'missapropration' which i was using in a technical manner rather than it's socially affiliated one.

That is why I asked.

Yes, so disruptive in the place of "misappropriated?"

I do try to keep on focus, not simple when others start to oppose me with negative statements.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 17 April 2006 - 06:20 PM

[barend]

That is why I asked.

Yes, so disruptive in the place of "misappropriated?"

disruptive is the effect, missapropriation is the cause. missapropriation as in inappropriation, as in taking an obscure part of a bigger picture and focusing your energy into it so diligently that it becomes impossible to redevert attention back to the original point.

its not a bad thing if it's just a side note, but it should not blaze out of control like a forest fire...

I do try to keep on focus, not simple when others start to oppose me with negative statements.

again one hand washes the other until both are dirty...

you go left field, and eveyone on the bus starts complaining, then you start justifying, this leads to questions, which leads to answers some don't like, which leads to more questions, and so on and so on until the bus has travelled so far off road that no one knows where they are and all that is leaft to do is argue about the predicament...

i consider myself the hand of god that picks the bus up and puts on the raod but the second i look back it's gone bush again...

[Deepsycher]

disruptive is the effect, missapropriation is the cause. missapropriation as in inappropriation, as in taking an obscure part of a bigger picture and focusing your energy into it so diligently that it becomes impossible to redevert attention back to the original point.

its not a bad thing if it's just a side note, but it should not blaze out of control like a forest fire...
again one hand washes the other until both are dirty...

you go left field, and eveyone on the bus starts complaining, then you start justifying, this leads to questions, which leads to answers some don't like, which leads to more questions, and so on and so on until the bus has travelled so far off road that no one knows where they are and all that is leaft to do is argue about the predicament...

i consider myself the hand of god that picks the bus up and puts on the raod but the second i look back it's gone bush again...

If I can focus in that way, it helps me to think in various patterns, I agree that I get carried away with it. Precisely with the current situation and the bus. Working out differences that way could be similar to a pure reaction with elements, until there is no reaction.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 17 April 2006 - 08:22 PM

[barend]

just don't ever smoke pot if you're already easily distracted...

the main thing is to explore any avenue you want but just try to keep the bus on the road...

i shouldn't have used the word avenue....

[Deepsycher]

Smoke pot, in relation to certain plants or drugs, I never did. An exp​ression in this case I won't know.

So my understand to this is: "Smoothly control the bus into any place without going on the edges."

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 17 April 2006 - 08:45 PM

[barend]

or diverting too far from the highway...

you can take in a couple drivthrough purchases, but don't slow the trip down too much.

[Deepsycher]

Okay, imagery to "off topic?"

Just thinking of a new set of questions.

Do you think that a sort of play fight could have been involved, but this time from soft things to "hard" things?

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 17 April 2006 - 08:55 PM

[barend]

i really don't know if it started out as a play fight...

i had a pillow fight that got out of control becuase i got the other guy in the eye...

but i took the physical blow and declared him the looser for loosing control and being unable to stick to clearly defined rules of pillow fighting ettiquette...

picking up hamers and whatever is a whole other thing...

maybe these guys had just been living together for too long...

i mean the fact that they were living together at their age, i'll bet there was a bit of sexual frustration over the fact that they were probably both single... and they took it out on each other, or just one on the other or whatever the hell happened.

i'm sure the surivors roommate in prison will be delighted to know that his imprisoning crime was killing his roomate...