...but to the argument at hand.
the someone for eveyone theory is not shot down by Civ#2, spoon, nor abby, but by the absurdity of such a notion in this civilisation. The saying probably had some grounding back in the day when men and women we'rent obbsessed with consatanly trying "to do better".
if someone loved you, you'd be happy but sadly in this day and age love is not enough... in fact its rarley a contributing factor, for while many claim they wish for someone who cares for them, who makes them laugh, etc. etc. they really just one someone who looks good and will make their friends jelous....
in a society where this is the ethos of 90% + of the people, i think that notion of yours died in the ass...
no amount of arguing is going to bring it back. you found someone... good for you, hold on to her if you care about her because its a rareity for many...
there is a whole world out there that you know nothing about, there's a dark fucking underbelly, that a lot of people will never know about and insist upon forcing their opinions on us as if it were gospel... and it takes a will of iron to not burden people with the truth of the world when you know they don't want to hear it...
but right now i'm telling you you're wrong, and there are alot of people who a pretty bitter about the state of affairs the resulted from tha hand that life delt them, and are powerless to do anything about it depsite their fiercest attepts... and if you should ever cram that blind optomistic proporganda in their face they will not react as charitabley as we have, as most of the people here have done okay or are too young for it to be a real concearn yet...
but your bright happy world were wonderful thing are all within reach, is a loverly place that you cannot see out of and not everyone is so fortunate to be invited.
the very fact that people think everything is okay is an insult to those for whom it is not, as it means that one can clearly not appreciate what they have if they have no understanding of how many are forced to go without.
Ah! Sarcasm! I gotchya.
no, i think you'll find it was something called opportunistic wit.
Touche! Isn't it usually people who own 4x4's in an urban area that use any method but spanking on their children? They're usually vegetarians, too...
i doubt they're vegitarians... the idea of vegitarian calling me a murderer and driving an anti-child tank would just send me into a fit of rage from which none would recover...
but there area lot of 4WDs out there that have no right to be... and they are making the world a dangerous place for everyone else.
and you just cant explain that to some kids...
although there are some kids out there who should be stoned for their godless misbehaviour and disrespect.