[Gobbler]

Yes, I know. I was talking about them too, going a little off-topic here, but nevermind. It's still one hell of a stupid idea.

[Deepsycher]

Yes, I know. I was talking about them too, going a little off-topic here, but nevermind. It's still one hell of a stupid idea.

I cannot see it as stupid idea if the execution is shown in demonstration to the public, as an example on what you get for killing people with intention. Do you have any ideas?

[Gobbler]

Yes damn it: Try to get past the times when pharaohs and the followers of a certain religion were allowed to pull such stupid jokes and try to be a little more human and considerate, maybe even actually working with people instead of giving in to your perverted desire for even more blood.

Executions in the public? Sometimes I really wish you were actually joking.

[Deepsycher]

Yes damn it: Try to get past the times when pharaohs and the followers of a certain religion were allowed to pull such stupid jokes and try to be a little more human and considerate, maybe even actually working with people instead of giving in to your perverted desire for even more blood.

Executions in the public? Sometimes I really wish you were actually joking.

Unless it was an accident, I recognise running into people with cars in public without returning, a public execution, do you call that a joke?

See what I mean?

And he was working against with the car. I know it is done religiously like with stoning which I disagree as most never killed anyone with intent and for petty reasons. Anyway what would the social impact be from your point of view it was possible?

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 February 2006 - 10:19 AM

[Gobbler]

No. And no. What are you trying to say?

[Deepsycher]

No. And no. What are you trying to say?

Just curious: If I run into you with a car in public with intent, unprovoked and non accidental, is that like a public execution?

Who thinks I should have the same for killing in that way? Oh and without the car.
Social impact in that: Would people think twice about attacking others with hate?

Will be back later...

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 February 2006 - 10:30 AM

[Gobbler]

1. Yes.
2. Not me, that's for sure.
3. Probably. I doubt it though, as people don't tend to think that much when they're on a killing spree.

Will be back later...

Is that a threat?

This post has been edited by Gobbler: 21 February 2006 - 10:31 AM

[Deepsycher]

1. Yes.
2. Not me, that's for sure.
3. Probably. I doubt it though, as people don't tend to think that much when they're on a killing spree.

Is that a threat?

Okay thank you, I did not mean for a killing spree, but for hatred. Still fuelled by a killing spree mechanism.

Just caught in time:
Nope, that means I'll will return, maybe hours later.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 21 February 2006 - 10:40 AM

[barend]

Australia doesn't believe in capital punishement.

...just capital driving.

[Deepsycher]

I like that: Capital killing sprees by know it all type people.

Having the drive of his life whilst expressing his drunk "know it all" type actions to those people and now, he is self oppressed. "That is a *good* way to go" as if there was no tomorrow.

[J m HofMarN]

He "is" going to go to the jail place for his hatred-crime. I, think it is a good idea, to lock know it all-people up, but not to execute them in public with a car or not. Like Roman times, too much, that would be. Why not should we have convicted, criminals fight in gladiator kind of fights?

[Deepsycher]

I like that, but still questioning that some people especially those who have nothing left to loose may do a killing spree to become a gladiator, unless indirectly feeding them to the lions and tigers. Do you think that this could help deter hatred crimes in effect?

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 22 February 2006 - 06:55 AM

[civilian_number_two]

Tigers are expensive. Also it's cruel to force them to kill and eat people in captivity, when they'd be better off in their natural environment, eating whatever they eat when they're not eating people. As for lions, they're boring and not as photogenic as tigers. I think the appropriate gladiatorial execution would be in some sort of demolition derby, only the victim doesn't get a car. And the whole thing could be broadcast on ESPN, with Hank Azaria doing commentary, in his role as "Cletus, the slack-jawed yokel."

[Deepsycher]

Okay, so the murderer eventually gets killed in the same or similar way to how the victims were murdered. Oh I mean not to become a gladiator if they knew they were food as to the lions and tigers.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 22 February 2006 - 04:19 PM

[Gobbler]

I did make clear that you're all a bunch of barbarians, didn't I?