Chefelf.com Night Life: KIng Kong - Chefelf.com Night Life

Jump to content

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »

KIng Kong

#1 User is offline   Revan-47 Icon

  • The Prophet
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Former Members
  • Posts: 1,276
  • Joined: 09-June 05
  • Location:Indiana
  • Country:United States

Posted 07 December 2005 - 08:07 PM

I know what you are all thinking, but the commercial for this movie gave me chills the other day. It actually gave me chills. So i decided to pop in my vhs recording of the old one and watched it.(better now that i am old enough to care about the plot, not just the giant ape eating people.) I am really excited. Before this, i only had two must-see-in-theaters movies, Narnia and harry potter, (have yet to see them) but now King Kong has topped them both. The scenes in the trailer, where the old WWII planes approach, WOW, it just gave me serious chills. Peter jackson wont let me down, this will be great.
"Life is too important to be taken seriously."
0

#2 User is offline   Despondent Icon

  • Think for yourself
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,684
  • Joined: 31-October 03
  • Location:a long time ago
  • Interests:Laughter. Louis pups. Percussion. What binds us. Bicycling, Tennis.
  • Country:United States

Posted 07 December 2005 - 11:26 PM

And it's getting good reviews. If it were SW, at this point the prequel camp would be countering.

It's interesting that so much of KK is CGI and there's not that criticism a PT film would automatically receive. I'm not validating the Lucas approach. However, I am looking forward to a methodically produced example of this technology without the Mucas touch.
0

#3 User is offline   Revan-47 Icon

  • The Prophet
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Former Members
  • Posts: 1,276
  • Joined: 09-June 05
  • Location:Indiana
  • Country:United States

Posted 08 December 2005 - 03:25 PM

It seems like the CGI in star wars looks a lot worse then in other movies.
"Life is too important to be taken seriously."
0

#4 User is offline   barend Icon

  • Anchor Head Anchor Man
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 11,839
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nieuw Holland
  • Interests:The Beers of Western Europe, Cognac, and constantly claiming the world would have been a better place if Napoleon had won.
  • Country:Australia

Posted 08 December 2005 - 08:11 PM

seems?
0

#5 User is offline   Lord Aquaman Icon

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,976
  • Joined: 19-November 04
  • Location:Atlantis
  • Interests:Movies, comic books, some mythology... basically anything that's larger than life.
  • Country:United States

Posted 10 December 2005 - 09:59 AM

QUOTE (Revan-47 @ Dec 8 2005, 01:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It seems like the CGI in star wars looks a lot worse then in other movies.

Could be because George Lucas is a CGI addict who overuses CGI to the extremes, no doubt as an extension of his control freak personality. Since perfecting CGI takes forever, some prefer to use it only sparingly and continue to opt for models or men in prosthetic make-up, etc.
I am the Fisher King.

I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.
0

#6 User is offline   Despondent Icon

  • Think for yourself
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,684
  • Joined: 31-October 03
  • Location:a long time ago
  • Interests:Laughter. Louis pups. Percussion. What binds us. Bicycling, Tennis.
  • Country:United States

Posted 10 December 2005 - 02:06 PM

QUOTE (Lord Aquaman @ Dec 10 2005, 10:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Since perfecting CGI takes forever,
I think you hit the nail on the head, Lord Aquaman.

And that's the problem with boldly presenting an understood presentation in a completely different medium. Lucas was in such a rush to stay ahead of the SFX/CGI schedules (an environment where the response to "do that! do this!" becomes far less immediate), that motive and voice were to a great extent ignored.

Until post-production of course. cool.gif
0

#7 User is offline   SithAvenger Icon

  • Wow, my avatar changed.
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,898
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Location:Err... here I guess.
  • Interests:The Interests of a Normal Teenager:<br />-Movies<br />-Things that are awesome<br />-Girls<br />-(Good) Tv shows<br />-Doing evil stuff the good way<br />-Videogames<br />-Hangin' with my friends
  • Country:Mexico

Posted 12 December 2005 - 04:03 AM

The movie looks great. I agree with Revan, the trailer was *bleeping* amazing.

However, I still haven't seen the 1933 version. Damn my luck!
Sorry, you won't be seeing a smartass sig here. Try with the next poster.
0

#8 User is offline   floppydisk Icon

  • The Amazing Bag-Man!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,325
  • Joined: 24-August 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beyone the Grave!
  • Interests:Movies. Books. Video Games.
  • Country:United States

Posted 12 December 2005 - 09:48 AM

QUOTE (Despondent @ Dec 7 2005, 11:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And it's getting good reviews. If it were SW, at this point the prequel camp would be countering.

It's interesting that so much of KK is CGI and there's not that criticism a PT film would automatically receive. I'm not validating the Lucas approach. However, I am looking forward to a methodically produced example of this technology without the Mucas touch.

The difference is that SW has so much stuff that didn't need to be CGI that was. I'm sure that it's pretty hard to get cool fight scenes with a guy in a monkey suit.

It was great to see that some of the models in Narnia were actually guys in suits. I think they look more real than the shiny CGI.
QUOTE (Theodor Herzl)
If you will it, it is no dream.
0

#9 User is offline   barend Icon

  • Anchor Head Anchor Man
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 11,839
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nieuw Holland
  • Interests:The Beers of Western Europe, Cognac, and constantly claiming the world would have been a better place if Napoleon had won.
  • Country:Australia

Posted 12 December 2005 - 08:18 PM

King Kong is 'virtually' a guy in a suit.

Andy Sirkis (Gollum) and Weta Digital have teamed up again to make Kong. He is not a straight up CGI creation, he is based on the movements of Sirkis as gollum was. And he studied apes, so what we get should be pretty awsome.
0

#10 User is offline   Otal Nimrodi Icon

  • Miracle Ghost
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,442
  • Joined: 26-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:I like my my little pony characters like I like my suspected criminals. Mirandized.
  • Country:United States

Posted 12 December 2005 - 08:44 PM

I'm hoping so. My friend, however, is more skeptical. He denounced it as 'Just a movie about a big monkey'.
Want a Tarot reading?

PM me, we'll talk.
0

#11 User is offline   SithAvenger Icon

  • Wow, my avatar changed.
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,898
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Location:Err... here I guess.
  • Interests:The Interests of a Normal Teenager:<br />-Movies<br />-Things that are awesome<br />-Girls<br />-(Good) Tv shows<br />-Doing evil stuff the good way<br />-Videogames<br />-Hangin' with my friends
  • Country:Mexico

Posted 16 December 2005 - 11:19 PM

I saw it today. Because I don't like to spoil stuff, I will only say this:

F*ckin' awesome.
Sorry, you won't be seeing a smartass sig here. Try with the next poster.
0

#12 User is offline   CowboyCurtis Icon

  • Soothsayer
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 800
  • Joined: 11-February 04
  • Location:Minnesooota
  • Interests:I lose interest in more things each and every day as things grow more and more mediocre and substandard...
  • Country:United States

Posted 16 December 2005 - 11:30 PM

I'm hoping so. My friend, however, is more skeptical. He denounced it as 'Just a movie about a big monkey'.

That would be "Mighty Joe Young" or "Gorillas in the Mist."

This is KONG, baby! smile.gif
Flying Ferret

Battle for the Galaxy--read the "other Star Wars"

All I know is I haven't seen the real prequels yet.
0

#13 User is offline   jariten Icon

  • making the nature scene
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,845
  • Joined: 18-August 04
  • Location:in the bin
  • Country:Nothing Selected

Posted 17 December 2005 - 03:48 AM

Im sure its great and all, but 3 HOURS from source material of, what, 1hr 30min? someone let the monkey off the leesh.

Oh yeah, its all those Oscars he got. I forgot.
0

#14 User is offline   Despondent Icon

  • Think for yourself
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,684
  • Joined: 31-October 03
  • Location:a long time ago
  • Interests:Laughter. Louis pups. Percussion. What binds us. Bicycling, Tennis.
  • Country:United States

Posted 17 December 2005 - 08:28 AM

Maybe he considers the later, 1976 version to be canon smile.gif (it was longer).
0

#15 User is offline   Revan-47 Icon

  • The Prophet
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Former Members
  • Posts: 1,276
  • Joined: 09-June 05
  • Location:Indiana
  • Country:United States

Posted 17 December 2005 - 06:09 PM

Has anybody seen the trailer with coldplay "i will fix you" playing in the background? i got serious chills. Im on christmas break now, so im going to have time to see narnia, harry potter, and KING koNG.
"Life is too important to be taken seriously."
0

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »


Fast Reply

  • Decrease editor size
  • Increase editor size