[Wayne]

OK, you know how a lot of oil companies have trouble with oil tankers crashing into rocks and leaking oil all over the place? It's a waste of money and oil, and kills the environment and stuff... I was wondering: Why not instead of one huge ship, they put the oil on several smaller ones? After all, those barges are the size of freakin' Chile and they steer like a drunk cow. A bunch of smaller ships are more manuverable and, if one of them leaks, they've still got plenty of oil left and the mess is a lot smaller! They save time AND money AND the fishies! Sheesh, the world should listen to us more often, we seem to be a lot smarter then everyone else.

Wouldn't be profitable. Lots of smaller ships use more oil than one big tanker in the same way that lots of smaller cars use more gas than a bus. And the ships run on gas, which means more oild has to be refined to make gasoline, which means they make less money. Eventually, they'd stop bothering with oil because they couldn't make enough money off of it, then there would be NO oil, until we agreed to allow oil companies use the tankers again.

[Zatoichi]

Or, if they would just utilize alternate forms of energy instead of trying to make as much money as they possibly could, then we wouldn't have to worry about it anymore. This of course, is merely wishful thinking.

[barend]

i think we should transport oil across the ocean in speed boats. one drum at a time or using several speed boats.

i think that makes the most sense.


you know, like all the rich assholes ho drives SUVs to work and clog the highways with one person per vehicle.

then when you ask them why they don't catch the bus, they say because the traffics so bad.

assholes. let's see how they feel about their logic when oil is delivered to them as innefficiently as they are to work.

[SimeSublime]

I just saw one of the commercials trying to get people to get smoking that have been put out recently. They squeezed a huge thing of fat or cholesterol out of an aorta. I could stand the brain being cut in half, but this almost made me puke. no joke.

You're just getting that now? We've had those ads for years. Actually, by you're description, I'd say you're seeing our castoffs.

[Laughlyn]

Meh;



('But pay for the NHS' is an alternative)

[Jane Sherwood]

This Just In: Rozerem sucks ass. I want my Ambien back.

[Mirithorn]

Complaint: At really, really short notice, I was invited to a sleepover last night. My parents said no, because the person hosting it wasn't supervised very well. Which was frustrating, because they could have just told me to call them if there were any problems. I can't really think of anything that could have gone wrong, even assuming that both people other than myself there (who I know very well) suddenly became other people, barring them becoming serial murderers.

[Revan-47]

yep, love blinds parents from the more logical path.

[Deepsycher]

Meh;



('But pay for the NHS' is an alternative)

Good point, I like that, should be called; National Holocaust Service, backed up by what is put into the cigars.

http://www.netdoctor...ctory_00508.htm

I have nothing against smoking, as I breathe in smoke everyday from incense sticks and for centuries, people rarely suffered from severe illnesses as they commonly do now. My main concern is what goes into a cigar, just like food. Recently they found that smokers are safer than the people breathing in the smoke. I'd say this is making gas camps out of people. Sadly from my experience on asking around, it appears these cigarette companies brain wash people into believing that this is how a cigar is meant to be made, as well as a warning label. I have never seen a healthy cigarette sold in a shop before, maybe from imports on sites.

If I want to smoke, will make my own using dry leaves, plants and filters or will buy from places that sell organic ones free of toxic.

Too much of one thing is not good as most know, but secretly adding toxic materials obviously known to damage health is unacceptable, worst of all with their brainwashing tactics.

Just my views on cigarettes.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 29 December 2005 - 09:49 PM

[Deepsycher]

Complaint: At really, really short notice, I was invited to a sleepover last night. My parents said no, because the person hosting it wasn't supervised very well. Which was frustrating, because they could have just told me to call them if there were any problems. I can't really think of anything that could have gone wrong, even assuming that both people other than myself there (who I know very well) suddenly became other people, barring them becoming serial murderers.

A solution I would use is to be specific to a point in an honest manner, but always add in fact and detail on non important information as the negative side and inconvenience, as if you were expecting more. Not sure if that would work in your case.


Do not know the real situation, but it sounds like they could not be bothered maybe for other reasons.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 29 December 2005 - 10:03 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

You might try to use the stove.

This post has been edited by Otal Nimrodi: 29 December 2005 - 10:08 PM

[Deepsycher]

You might try to use the stove.

A stove for what?
Or was that for someone else?

[Otal Nimrodi]

The other reasons they might be bothered.

[Deepsycher]

Edit: Oh, other reasons in, that she might "use" a stove as for being "too young" or in abstract terms stoves as "barbeques" at the party, opposingly seen as a danger, not to mention the hot pokers there, but this time one minus.

If that is the case, it is a bit patronising considering all the food she will be missing.


Well I do not go to many parties myself, only when buying of someone and seeing what food I can get.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 29 December 2005 - 10:45 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

Umm, Mirithorn is a she.