[SithAvenger]

Today on June 13 of 2005, Michael Jackson has been declared NOT guilty of molesting childs. I mean, did Michael Jackson bribe the jury? All evidence points that Michael Jackson is a child molester.

The first time he went on trial I thought he was inocent, but now I think he really molests childs on Neverland.

Who thinks Michael Jackson is a child molester and why?

[Jane Sherwood]

I'm not surprised he got off. Not in the least.

And to be honest, I really, really don't care.

[LiocModnar]

Michael strikes me as a classic case of arrested development. I've no doubt he did some inappropriate things but I fail to see sexual or powerplay motive, nor do I think he's aware of the wrongness of the situations. He definitely needs counseling, both for his surgical obsessions and his lack of maturity. However, as far as child molestation goes, I'm glad to see he was deemed not guilty.

[J m HofMarN]

I'm rather glad he got acquited as well. It pisses me off that people like the District Attorney of LA can prey on people just because they look weird, and its pretty clear that the kid's family, much like the last time, were just in it for the money. And some of the counts are just bullshit. Letting a teenager drink wine? Fuck the whole country would be found guilty.

Also, you do realize that the correct pluralization is children, right?

it's one of those odd words in the English language.

[Slade]

Actually, all evidence pointed to him not molesting children. And after all of the money he's had to come up with just to defend all of these claims of molestation, he's not likely to have much left to bribe an entire jury. He was aquitted of 10 seperate charges in this trial.

But of course, a person simply must be guilty if they are to stand trial, right, refugee?

[Ninja Duck]

I believe that the justice system has done its job, and I am going to be so bummed if MJ admits that he was guilty right before he dies or something.

[barend]

to be honest... i don't think he molested anyone...

he no doubt engaged in activites that were inapropriate, but i doubt sexually motivated.

the guy is a freak, and he wants to be child, and he should have known that in this day and age, you're considered a child molestoror if you hug your child for more than five seconds, let alone share a bed with a group of someone elses, that he would get into shit for it...

so, my advice?
close neverland, or make it's trading hours finish at 6pm...

no sleepovers.

and all beatles songs rights should go to me...

how much fucking money do you need mr.jackson?

[Slade]

Enough to pay for Hollywood lawsuits every time a fuckhead gets greedy and wants to abuse the legal system.

[Heccubus]

Question #1:
Who cares?

Question #2:
How can someone think he bribed the jury? He had plenty of witnesses who could attest to the fact that he was straight-up on the matter.

Question #3:
Do we not know where the Debate Club is? Moving.

[Slade]

Aye. Newcomers, please read the rules. I don't like getting out the mod stick and poking people in the eyes with it.

If you respect everybody and have a decent level of intelligence or absurdity, you'll get along fine fnord.

[J m HofMarN]

I was surprised it took so long for this topic to be moved.

...MEAT!

[Jordan]

I'm not sure if I really care. Perhaps he is just a weirdo, from what I read, I'm not sure if I was convinced that he screwed little boys.

[Kirby]

In other news, Saddam Husaine would like his trial moved to Santa Maria.

Bah, he got off like all the other rich/famous people, look at the track record: OJ and Robert Blake, but I digress.

I says he did it, but he got off because the kids mom went on the stand and f*cked it all up. She was a schemer, manipulater, and all around bad person. She threw her son in the lion's den and for that SHE should go on trial, but that does not also put Jackson off the hook. He did his shit, and she did her's.

[Jen]

I think the two things the evidence seemed to prove is that 1) the family of the accuser was clearly trying to profit off of the situation and that 2) Michael Jackson is clearly sexually inappropriate with children, even if it couldn't be proved that he was, in specific instances, sexually inappropriate with his accuser. I'm with you, Kirby. I know I sure as shit wouldn't leave any child I knew alone with that guy.

[J m HofMarN]

No, you wouldn't, unless you were in it to make a profit. And if you're willing to have your child molested in order to make a few bucks wouldn't you be willing to fake sexually activity in order to make a few bucks and accuse an innocent man?