[J m HofMarN]

Hmmm we ask you for an actual answer and we get ignored, but you sure are good at posting pointless links that match one word from the debate which you typed into google!

[barend]

yeah it was likie this:

hannibal: you're all stupid and know nothing, you should listen to me i will enlighten you with my google research, you dumb fucks. your opinions are worthless.
barend: stop talking down to people...
hannibal: you're the one talking down to people, you don't respect other peoples opinions
barend: alright proove it.
hannibal: i'm ignoring you now!!!

yeah...

if your still a hanni fan after that...
well...

[J m HofMarN]

Yes it's true, Barend and I do not respect other peoples opinions*.









*If those opinions consist entirely of that person believing they're better than everyone.

[HK 47]

hannibal: you're all stupid and know nothing, you should listen to me i will enlighten you with my google research, you dumb fucks. your opinions are worthless.
barend: stop talking down to people...
hannibal: you're the one talking down to people, you don't respect other peoples opinions
barend: alright proove it.
hannibal: i'm ignoring you now!!!

yeah...

if your still a hanni fan after that...
well...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Did you guys expect any other form of reply? A cool and sincere post from him? Blissfully free of insults, insane rants and attention whoring? Think again...

[Hannibal]

Children. Your constant whining is making you look worse than ever before.

[barend]

pffft...

[J m HofMarN]

Constant Whining: A and N. con-STANT WINE-ing

To constantly whine is to post various topics about how actors say cloning is ok, how people cut off their limbs, or George Lucas plotting to hollow out the moon.

Synonyms: Annoying, crazy, incoherent, self important, superiority complex, long winded.

See also: Hannibal.

This post has been edited by J m HofMarN: 26 March 2005 - 01:30 AM

[Despondent]

Hannibal started this thread some four pages ago. If you don't want to encourage him, this is certainly one approach.

[barend]

yeah, well ignoring him doesn't work...
he replies to his own posts ten times in a row.

and posts the same topic six times in a row

he makes a chalange and cannot hold his own. this is the best way to overexposes him for the naive, attention seeking, repedative, juvenille amature he is, thus preventing the development of a fan club!!!

and he called you a dumbass!

[Hannibal]

 

SCIENCE NEWS
March 25, 2005 

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in T. rex Fossil
Science Image: dino bone
Image: SCIENCE
 
Dinosaur fossils are rare finds. But the 70-million-year-old bones of a Tyrannosauraus rex recovered from Montana are proving to be even more exceptional than the usual dino remains. Researchers report today in the journal Science that they have recovered soft tissue, including blood vessels, from the ancient creature.

Mary Schweitzer of North Carolina State University and her colleagues studied T. rex remains recovered in 2003 from a quarry in the Charles M. Russell Wildlife Preserve that date to roughly 70 million years ago. The specimen, known as MOR 1125 or B-rex, includes a 107-centimeter-long femur bone. Studying the bones in the lab, the team treated part of the femur with a solution designed to dissolve its mineral components. The substance left behind was a stretchy material that showed blood vessels, bone-building cells known as osteocytes and other organic features when observed under a microscope.
ADVERTISEMENT (article continues below)
The researchers then compared the material to structures found in the bones of ostriches, because living birds are the closest relatives to dinosaurs available for study. They report similarities in both the branching of the blood vessels and the presence of reddish brown dots, which could be nuclei from endothelial cells that line blood vessels. "Our preliminary research shows that antibodies that recognize collagen [the fibrous protein constituent of bone] react to chemical extracts of this fossil bone, " Schweitzer says. "If further studies confirm this, we may have the potential to learn more not only about the dinosaurs themselves, but also about how and why they were preserved in the first place." --Sarah Graham

Let the horrors of cloning begin...

This post has been edited by Hannibal: 26 March 2005 - 09:17 PM

[Hannibal]

This debate is not in any way about whether or not its ethical to kill people (or clones) and steal their organs. Noone believes that that would be a good thing. We've been arguing that there are good points to cloning and that it can be used for things other than what you've misinterpreted it as being for.

Right ... like why isn't it okay to grow human parts on chickens or mice...instead of headless human bodiy clones...

here's my answer to why that's wrong:

[J m HofMarN]

Mommy make the crazy man stop!

[Despondent]

and he called you a dumbass!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I hadn't noticed.

Which must prove I'm done a good job ignoring his posts.

[barend]

too good if you ask me :wink:

[Stongbah]

This was funny enough to make me come back here.

Honestly Hannibal, you seem to want to have a conversation, but all you're doing is talking down to people, criticizing anyone who has (gasp)different views on topics, and posting random images and writings that somehow do something. Against my better judgement, I will try to debate about a topic with you in a calm and friendly manner. You say that you're against cloning individual organs because only those with money will benefit, but that's always how it is with medicine. The facilities you would need to clone and preserve organs would cost billions and billions of dollars to operate. For the hospital to take care of this themselves would be impossible. They're not greedy, if hospitals never charged people for their services they would not be able to operate, then no one would recieve any medical treatment.

This post has been edited by Stongbah: 29 March 2005 - 02:33 AM