http://www.guidancet...es/lucaspic.jpg
Page 1 of 1
King of the World! ...and down she went...
#1
Posted 12 February 2005 - 10:33 PM
"Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities also has the power to make you commit atrocities."
~ Voltaire (1694-1778)
Enjoy this Tribute to Nazism...(Mp3)
~ Voltaire (1694-1778)
Enjoy this Tribute to Nazism...(Mp3)
#3
Posted 14 February 2005 - 12:48 AM
that's gold.
>>The Adventures of Heinrich Von Bastard<< (A Web Comic)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
Also: The Chefelf.com Lord of the Rings | RoBUTZ (a primative webcomic) | KOTOR 1 NPC profiles |
Music: HYPOID (industrial rock) | Spectrox Toxemia (Death Metal) | Cannibalingus (80s style thrash metal) | Wasabi Nose Bleed (Exp.Techno) | DeadfeeD (Exp.Ambient) |||(more to come)
#4
Posted 14 February 2005 - 01:02 AM
Yeah, I remember Entertainment Tonight spotlighting that in 1998.
When Titanic surpassed Star Wars (a new hope for some) as the top grossing film of all-time it was a blow to Lucas, who held the title for twenty years.
Having your in-house artist draw up something to put the company in a good light is always a good move.
When Titanic surpassed Star Wars (a new hope for some) as the top grossing film of all-time it was a blow to Lucas, who held the title for twenty years.
Having your in-house artist draw up something to put the company in a good light is always a good move.
#6
Posted 14 February 2005 - 08:57 AM
Quick Note:
'Star Wars' ($323 mil) was actually only the #1 box office performer for five years, until "E.T." came out in 1982, which made $399 million.
It was only the release of the 'Special Edition' in 1997 that 'Star Wars' passed E.T. I think it was so big in 1997 only because it was kind of hip and cool, not because people wanted to see the movie. (Note how the opening weekend for each successive 'Special Edition' PLUMMETED.)
So basically 'Star Wars' was only #1 for six total years.
'Star Wars' ($323 mil) was actually only the #1 box office performer for five years, until "E.T." came out in 1982, which made $399 million.
It was only the release of the 'Special Edition' in 1997 that 'Star Wars' passed E.T. I think it was so big in 1997 only because it was kind of hip and cool, not because people wanted to see the movie. (Note how the opening weekend for each successive 'Special Edition' PLUMMETED.)
So basically 'Star Wars' was only #1 for six total years.
#9
Posted 15 February 2005 - 10:38 PM
QUOTE (Despondent @ Feb 14 2005, 01:02 AM)
Yeah, I remember Entertainment Tonight spotlighting that in 1998.
When Titanic surpassed Star Wars (a new hope for some) as the top grossing film of all-time it was a blow to Lucas, who held the title for twenty years.
When Titanic surpassed Star Wars (a new hope for some) as the top grossing film of all-time it was a blow to Lucas, who held the title for twenty years.
Do you think that was why the prequels were so poor? lucas was more motivated than ever to turn star wars into the biggest commercial success of all time.
Page 1 of 1