Chefelf.com Night Life: lucas. - Chefelf.com Night Life

Jump to content

Star Wars Fan Convention

Page 1 of 1

lucas. profile of a downfall

#1 User is offline   barend Icon

  • Anchor Head Anchor Man
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 11,839
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nieuw Holland
  • Interests:The Beers of Western Europe, Cognac, and constantly claiming the world would have been a better place if Napoleon had won.
  • Country:Australia

Posted 06 January 2005 - 11:18 PM

i have finally figured it out.

lucas used to hang out with Martin Scorcasi (sp), Stephen Speilberg, etc.

he never wanted artistic success... he, like all nerds, wanted to be popular.
and the OT took that popularity he wanted for himself...

he wanted to hear people shouting and chanting his name, but instead the public cried for Boba Fett, Darth Vader, and so on... the very characters he destroys in his PTs, SEs, and coments about such characters...

all this damage and destruction, it's all about jelousy...

jelousy of his own creations, that has lead to the apathetic approach to film making we have been subjected to.

all this, all these questions are a product of this petty self induced scitzophrenic self hatered, all boils down to the publics love of something he no longer feels he had complete control over, he feels that perhaps if the films are purley his work, he'll share no glory with anyone else, and the films will direct the publics love directly to him, and him alone...

like a father jelous of his own sons acheivements instead of taking pride in what he helped create...

just pathetic and twisted.
0

#2 User is offline   The Scornful Roman Icon

  • Henchman
  • Pip
  • Group: Junior Members
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: 25-October 04
  • Country:United States

Post icon  Posted 06 January 2005 - 11:48 PM

Well, that's pretty diabolical, barend. I don't know, but I think that George Lucas is so in love with the new technology available today that he's forgotten key elements like a good story and appealing characters. Perhaps he has been so out of the loop of directing and putting together a story, he has virtually forgotten how to do so.

Partly, at least, it IS probably about his ego. Look how he's put his foot down on ever releasing the OOT to DVD. It's as if he's ashamed of it, and its 'crude' effects. He's so driven by CGI effects and the images they can create, and he's such a powerful man, that he can do whatever he wants, and perhaps power has gone to his head. Maybe the pressure from the suits and the fear of failure and the fact that everybody around him was thinking that the first original Star Wars was gonna be a flop kept him honest, or at least humble. Perhaps it was the input of other writers, other thinkers, and the director of ESB that kept George Lucas' more crazy ideas-- the inherent flaws in his execution of a story, perhaps, because as great an imagination as the guy's got, he's got flaws-- in check and safely locked away from harming the story.

Perhaps, in the end, Lucas never was that good of a storyteller to begin with. Oh sure, he had a great idea with Star Wars and its characters, don't get me wrong, but perhaps in the doing of those ideas, he lacks something-- a certain subtle quality, a finesse. Carrie Fisher said that when George was directing, he'd say two things, "Faster" or "More intense". Look at the PT-- all fast, colorful, flashing images, mostly CGI, bright colors-- it's like a huge pinball machine, crossed with a bad videogame, crossed with those annoying "Hard Copy" trash-news shows from the '90's. All flashing, zooming graphics and loud sounds but no quietness and depth-- no room for the characters to breathe. Perhaps it's in George Lucas to strangle his stories with the intensity that he wants in the visuals and in the editing, and there's no one around to tell him "No, this isn't working. It's too much and too fast." When we went to see AOTC at the theaters, there was a little boy crying at it-- it was too loud and intense a movie for a small child.
0

#3 User is offline   jariten Icon

  • making the nature scene
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,845
  • Joined: 18-August 04
  • Location:in the bin
  • Country:Nothing Selected

Posted 07 January 2005 - 06:16 AM

QUOTE
all fast, colorful, flashing images, mostly CGI, bright colors-- it's like a huge pinball machine, crossed with a bad videogame, crossed with those annoying "Hard Copy" trash-news shows from the '90's


Hang on, are you describing the OT here or the PT? Oh "CGI", must be the PT. Don't think for a second though that people wern't (and still aren't) making the same complaints about the OT.
0

#4 User is offline   Lord Aquaman Icon

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,976
  • Joined: 19-November 04
  • Location:Atlantis
  • Interests:Movies, comic books, some mythology... basically anything that's larger than life.
  • Country:United States

Posted 07 January 2005 - 10:05 AM

QUOTE (jariten @ Jan 7 2005, 04:16 AM)
Hang on, are you describing the OT here or the PT? Oh "CGI", must be the PT. Don't think for a second though that people wern't (and still aren't) making the same complaints about the OT.


???

I'm inclined to think that it's a combination of being out of touch with directing/writing and selfishness.
I am the Fisher King.

I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.
0

#5 User is offline   Despondent Icon

  • Think for yourself
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,684
  • Joined: 31-October 03
  • Location:a long time ago
  • Interests:Laughter. Louis pups. Percussion. What binds us. Bicycling, Tennis.
  • Country:United States

Posted 07 January 2005 - 12:12 PM

QUOTE (The Scornful Roman @ Jan 6 2005, 11:48 PM)
When we went to see AOTC at the theaters, there was a little boy crying at it



there would have been a prodigal rooster boy crying also, but the only emotion AOTC stirred was despondency.
0

#6 User is offline   not this crude matter Icon

  • Henchman
  • Pip
  • Group: Former Members
  • Posts: 99
  • Joined: 02-January 05
  • Country:Nothing Selected

Posted 07 January 2005 - 10:44 PM

After reading the first post, I have come to realize fanboys were the worst thing to EVER happen to Star Wars.
0

#7 User is offline   The Scornful Roman Icon

  • Henchman
  • Pip
  • Group: Junior Members
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: 25-October 04
  • Country:United States

Post icon  Posted 07 January 2005 - 11:27 PM

QUOTE (not this crude matter @ Jan 7 2005, 10:44 PM)
After reading the first post, I have come to realize fanboys were the worst thing to EVER happen to Star Wars.


What?? ermm.gif barend asked some good questions, IMHO. mellow.gif
0

#8 User is offline   not this crude matter Icon

  • Henchman
  • Pip
  • Group: Former Members
  • Posts: 99
  • Joined: 02-January 05
  • Country:Nothing Selected

Posted 08 January 2005 - 01:02 AM

What questions did he ask The scornful Roman? mellow.gif
0

#9 User is offline   The Scornful Roman Icon

  • Henchman
  • Pip
  • Group: Junior Members
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: 25-October 04
  • Country:United States

Post icon  Posted 08 January 2005 - 01:31 PM

Well, I admit I phrased that wrong. Let's just say barend didn't so much ask a question as pose a possible answer to a question that most of us have undoubtably asked, namely, "Why did George Lucas, after making the fairly solid (not entirely flawless, mind, but still pretty darn good) OT, then go and make the PT, which the majority of us here hate?"

I apologize for the bad word choice, but I thought for a while that you were jumping on barend, when I feel that he posted a pretty good thread. ermm.gif wink.gif
0

#10 User is offline   Paladin Icon

  • Soothsayer
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 780
  • Joined: 29-December 03

Posted 08 January 2005 - 01:47 PM

QUOTE
there would have been a prodigal rooster boy crying also, but the only emotion AOTC stirred was despondency.


For me, the only emotiuon was frustraion. Naybe a hint of anger, too, but ont all that much.

And what exactly is in this movie that would cause anyone to cry?
0

#11 User is offline   The Scornful Roman Icon

  • Henchman
  • Pip
  • Group: Junior Members
  • Posts: 69
  • Joined: 25-October 04
  • Country:United States

Post icon  Posted 08 January 2005 - 01:56 PM

QUOTE (Paladin @ Jan 8 2005, 01:47 PM)
For me, the only emotiuon was frustraion. Naybe a hint of anger, too, but ont all that much.

And what exactly is in this movie that would cause anyone to cry?


Plenty, Paladin; plenty...

But the little boy in question was just doing what most small children do when they are overstimulated. AOTC was too loud and too much for him. I really, really wish that people would stop using the theatre as a sort of brain-numbing pacifer for their children; they take the kids to films that are wildly inappropriate for a small toddler (AvP, for instance; I loved the movie but there was an annoying toddler there who kept squeaking and making noise occasionally).
0

#12 User is offline   CowboyCurtis Icon

  • Soothsayer
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 800
  • Joined: 11-February 04
  • Location:Minnesooota
  • Interests:I lose interest in more things each and every day as things grow more and more mediocre and substandard...
  • Country:United States

Posted 08 January 2005 - 08:00 PM

Oh, no, I totally agree with Barend, and we can even add some to that theory. smile.gif

After reading the first post, I have come to realize fanboys were the worst thing to EVER happen to Star Wars.

Yeah, there certianly is a faction of fanboys that I have to call their judgment into question.

No offense, Jariten.
Flying Ferret

Battle for the Galaxy--read the "other Star Wars"

All I know is I haven't seen the real prequels yet.
0

#13 User is offline   barend Icon

  • Anchor Head Anchor Man
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Crappy News Team
  • Posts: 11,839
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nieuw Holland
  • Interests:The Beers of Western Europe, Cognac, and constantly claiming the world would have been a better place if Napoleon had won.
  • Country:Australia

Posted 18 January 2005 - 06:31 AM

i'm not alowwing this thread to fall down into the shadows of page 2 onwards...

i think there is some real discussion to be had here...

or did i just nail it in the first hit?
either way i guess i'm happy...

This post has been edited by barend: 18 January 2005 - 06:34 AM

0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  • Decrease editor size
  • Increase editor size