James12345 - Viewing Profile

James12345's Profile User Rating:

Reputation: 0 Neutral

Group:: Junior Members
Active Posts:: 86 (0.01 per day)
Most Active In:: Debate Club (46 posts)
Joined:: 05-July 05
Profile Views:: 2,870
Last Active:: Aug 16 2005 03:47 PM
Currently:: Offline

Previous Fields

Country:: United States

James12345 has not set their status

Posts I've Made

In Topic: We Gays Have Rights

Posted 16 Aug 2005

QUOTE (Renegade @ Aug 13 2005, 02:52 AM)
But your excellency says homosexuality is a product of that corrupt capatalistic system and has condemned it!!! DONT YOU AGREE WITH YOUR EXCELLENCY!?!?! !?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Get em!
In Topic: Most Hated Characters

Posted 12 Aug 2005

QUOTE (xenduck @ Jul 30 2005, 03:56 PM)
ya really, whats the point of saying "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away" if its not just another galaxy but a whole seperate universe? if its a diffenrent universe, the opening scrawl should say, "at this exact same moment in a dimension very, very parallel" or, you know, something like that
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

No your right....hmmmm....RUN
In Topic: Most Hated Characters

Posted 12 Aug 2005

QUOTE (Chefelf @ Jul 26 2005, 09:54 AM)
But don't you see the huge problem with ETs? It's not how major a role they play to the plot or if they are noticeable. They bridge the gap between our universe and the Star Wars universe. It shows a creature who has clearly visited Earth. Sure, we don't know the timeline of the events but it opens the possibility that the ETs have shared the location of Earth with the rest of the Star Wars galaxy. That is completely unacceptable!
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Right, but for arguments sake, we must assume that Earth doesn't exist in the Star Wars Universe what so ever. But humans do, how odd....

Anyway E.T. is stupid but not as bad as either Jar Jar Binks, all Gungans or Watto... yeah maybe worse than Watto
In Topic: LEGO SW

Posted 12 Aug 2005

QUOTE (SithAvenger @ Aug 12 2005, 12:44 PM)
And this is the only game where you can kill Jar Jar. Yipee!
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

LOL
In Topic: The Right to Bear Arms

Posted 12 Aug 2005

QUOTE (barend @ Aug 11 2005, 11:22 PM)
a sword is still only an extention of your arm. it requires finess, intuition, style, co-ordination, strength, agility, and good pokerface...

unarmed combat is still more admirable because a small guy can still take ona big guy if he is skilled enough.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

See this is what I was hoping you would say.

That you believe as a stronger or more skilled combatant deserves to win. Its his right...

Well a 9mm could beat a M4 if the shooter is skilled enough too.

See Barend, the world has changed, guns are now the conventional weapons of the day. Maybe less elegant than lightsabers, but how honorable is having a dagger stabbed in your groin or armpit and being left to bleed to death or die of infection?