Chefelf.com Night Life: Darth Pants - Viewing Profile

Jump to content

Darth Pants's Profile User Rating: -----

Reputation: 0 Neutral
Group:
Junior Members
Active Posts:
31 (0 per day)
Most Active In:
Star Wars Fan Convention (31 posts)
Joined:
21-February 05
Profile Views:
3,910
Last Active:
User is offline Aug 16 2008 03:49 AM
Currently:
Offline

Previous Fields

How did you find the site?:
Friend sent me the link to your reasons to hate SW.
Country:
India
Icon   Darth Pants has not set their status

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: 78 Reasons to Hate Episode I

    Posted 15 Aug 2008

    QUOTE
    That's interesting DP, I also decided to watch this film over recently, and I honestly couldn't sit through it. I ended up skipping many scenes and turning it off. This is the best I've felt in a while. Seriously!


    The only new thing I learned from watching the prequels once again - and let me tell you that it was a painful experience, especially the Anakin/Padme romance in AOTC - was the word Poodoo. It's uttered twice to my knowledge, once in TPM and once in AOTC. smile.gif And the thing I like about it is that it describes the series PERFECTLY.

    I call it the series because I personally believe that the Prequels and the OT are different beasts, altogether. The OT wasn't perfect, but it was engaging and a load of fun to watch, unlike the POODOO that is the PT.
  2. In Topic: new Indiana Jones

    Posted 13 Aug 2008

    Let's see:

    2) Shia Le Beouf
    3) His siblings, the monkeys.
    4) Irena Spalco.
    5) Indiana Jones surviving a nuclear explosion at less than close range because Georgie and Stevie wanted some fancy CGI in this flick.
    6) Totally derived stunts from the older Indiana Jones movies amped X3 - so much for originality!
    7) Too little of Marion Ravenwood
    8) Movie reeks of CGI
    9) A statue of Marcus Brodie, and pictures of Willie Scott and Henry Jones Sr. do not nostalgia bring!
    10) It's Nuclear, not Nuculur!
    11) Since when did Indy become a goddamn war hero?
    12) Since when did Indiana Jones start emulating James Bond?
    13) Does anyone give a damn about Charlie and Huxley?
  3. In Topic: 78 Reasons to Hate Episode I

    Posted 13 Aug 2008

    I just watched this again after a gap of years and realise that the phantom movie can be reviewed in one word - and that word is:

    POODOO!

    Thanks George for making preview reviews so much easier. tongue.gif
  4. In Topic: Harry Potter and the Stolen Plot Devices

    Posted 9 Jan 2006

    QUOTE
    The thing that really bothered me in the 6th book was Dumbledore's death. There was absolutely no point of him dying. I can understand that if they went to that cave, and Dumbledore gave his life to find a REAL horcrux, then maybe it would have been a worthwhile death. But instead, there's this totally pointless journey where Dumbledore stupidly poisons himself and then lets Snape kill him.

    It's basically like Rowling was thinking "Wow, this book has been pretty boring so far. Maybe if I kill off one of the most important characters it will really take people back."


    LOL!

    I agree with you, Obi Wan Dumbledore didn't need to die at that point, but his death was the only high point in Half Arsed Prince, take that away and the book is, well, DULL.

    QUOTE
    And I really don't see why Harry shouldn't become the next dark lord. He is a horribly undisciplined wizard, should have been chosen into the Slytherin house, has attempted to cast the Crucio curse twice, and is proficient with using some of the "Half Blood Prince's" dark spells. I would actually welcome the surprise of him becoming a dark lord.


    Yes, it would be nice but Rowling's just too damn conservative to make him the next dark lord. Her writing has not impressed me a bit, so far.

    When book 4 was released Rowling said that a major character was going to be killed - that major character turned out to be Cedric Diggory. laugh.gif Then she killed another two-bit character, Sirius Black, in book 5. Sirius may be Harry's godfather, but since he's introduced in late book 3, we don't care much for him. Obi Wan Dumbledore's the only long-standing character she's killed, 6 books into the series and that's ridiculous, IMO. More long standing characters should've bit the dust by now.

    QUOTE
    Alas, we're going to be subjected to Harry, a lucky (NOT skilled) wizard, defeating Voldemort in a 1 on 1 duel.


    Harry' s too inept to become the next dark lord. We're told that Riddle was studious and brilliant. Harry, well, he's another story, altogether. Honestly, I can't see him defeating Palpy Voldy. Rowling will do something cheesy and contrived to make that happen - wanna bet that the raging munster in Harry's chest will defeat the Dark Lord?
  5. In Topic: Harry Potter and the Stolen Plot Devices

    Posted 7 Jan 2006

    QUOTE
    I'd say she did a good enough job up to the sixth book. The Half Blood Prince was just totally dull. And I'm just waiting for the totally unrealistic situation in the 7th book where Harry Potter defeats Lord Voldemort in a 1 on 1 duel.


    You mean Harry Potter and the Half-Arsed Prince? Yes, it was totally dull apart from Obi Wan Dumbledore's death. tongue.gif Rowling seems to be fairly adept at writing cheesy romances, though - HAP was full of 'em!

    QUOTE
    He is aided in his quest by two companions - one male, one female - who end up romantically involved with each other.


    You forget to talk about their bickering. Not like Han/Leia, in my opinion, but more like R2D2 and C3PO.

    QUOTE
    SCENE ONE

    VOLDEMORT: First I want you to go to Hogwart's School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Eliminate all wizards. Do what must be done, Lord Potter. Do not hesistate, show no mercy. Only then will you be strong enough to see your parents again.

    HARRY: Yes, my master.


    SCENE TWO
    Harry is marching up the stairs into Hogwarts. At least 200 death eaters are following behind him.


    SCENE THREE
    Harry enters the Griffyndor Common Room. Several frightened first year students are awake and relieved to see Harry.

    YOUNG WIZARD: Harry. There are too many of them. What are we to do?

    HARRY: AVADA KEDAVRA!


    LOL! But I do feel that Rowling lacks the guts to do that. There's no way she's going to turn Harry into the next "dark lord" - she's already said time and time again that HP isn't Star Wars. In fact, I was perusing her interviews and I got the impression that she was trying to distance HP from SW.

    QUOTE
    At first I thougth Rowling jumped the shark with book 2, but then she rebounded with book 3, and then books 4 and 5 were just really overlong and then there was that whole prophecy crap in #5. Book 6 was okay, though the only exceptional part was.... I'm not saying for those who haven't read it.


    IMO The only semi-decent book that Rowling's written is book 3 - coincidently, that was the only book in which Voldy (I know, it rhymes with Palpy) does not face Harry.

    QUOTE
    I still think Rowling's books are very far from being either original or good


    I agree.

My Information

Member Title:
New Cop
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender

Contact Information

E-mail:
Private