Deucaon - Viewing Profile

Deucaon's Profile User Rating:

Reputation: 0 Neutral

Group:: Members
Active Posts:: 594 (0.09 per day)
Most Active In:: Debate Club (256 posts)
Joined:: 27-December 06
Profile Views:: 19,142
Last Active:: Jul 20 2011 08:52 PM
Currently:: Offline

Previous Fields

Country:: Australia

Latest Visitors

Tasnek
25 Sep 2011 - 14:00
Jordan
07 Jul 2011 - 22:15
Icey
19 Jan 2011 - 20:41
J m HofMarN
29 Dec 2010 - 03:13
Quoth
07 Jul 2010 - 21:28
Supes
30 Nov 2009 - 00:34
Gobbler
03 Aug 2009 - 09:12
Ninja Duck
27 Apr 2009 - 00:12
arien
26 Apr 2009 - 12:04
barend
23 Apr 2009 - 04:57

Deucaon is angry. Very, very angry.

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Yahtzee

Posted 20 Jul 2011

(Yahtzee, entering Queensland. His arrival was overblown, so to speak.)
In Topic: I would be happy to NOT redesign the site.

Posted 20 Jul 2011

Quote

# 5 Replies
# 1,198 Views

How in the fuck?
In Topic: Sorry, guys. I totally forgot about this place.

Posted 6 Jul 2011

LMFAO. Stay classy, CNT.
In Topic: Deuacon's homosexual supremacists thread

Posted 18 Jan 2011

Icey, on 13 January 2011 - 10:50 AM, said:
You are ridiculous. Couples pay less taxes because people staying together creating strong family units is usually the best thing for everyone, and creates a safety net is a member of the unit turns ill. This is an incentive. It is discriminatory because the qualification to get the incentive doesn't require offspring made through penis in vagina or at all, but sometimes they can't be the same gender. It is also a legal union which tells the universe that this is your life partner, which has all sorts of legal ramification and does give people rights.

Stop overthinking things.

Rebuttal: childless couples and single parents. Homosexuals fall into the former category.
In Topic: Deuacon's homosexual supremacists thread

Posted 15 Jan 2011

Also, Hoffman, you say I support eugenics because I oppose the persecution of people based on their sexual preferences. Whereas you support the practise of abortion which directly leads to eugenic practises like people killing their kid because it wasn't a male/female plus a disproportionately large number of poor ethnic/racial minorities having abortions. Which is a more direct form of eugenics? I don't know about you but I have never advocated that homosexuals, for any reason, be cut out of their mother's womb and thrown into a bin. But I guess if, in the distant future, a mother found out that their kid was going to be a homosexual and had an abortion on that whim then you'd be for it.