Commoner's Profile
Reputation: 0
Neutral
- Group:
- Junior Members
- Active Posts:
- 78 (0.01 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Star Wars Fan Convention (78 posts)
- Joined:
- 24-June 04
- Profile Views:
- 2,153
- Last Active:
- Mar 17 2005 01:40 PM
- Currently:
- Offline
Previous Fields
Topics I've Started
-
Story Set-up: Poll 3
Posted 5 Jul 2004
I can't think of any other villains that could possibly used in the beginning. As I dislike the TF villains, the Mandelorians, as they were mentioned in the ESB novelisation, should've been the main villains for the prequels, IMHO. -
Sith Lords: Rule of Two Poll 2
Posted 5 Jul 2004
I've never liked the rule of two. I thought there should've been more Sith. Just can't imagine two Sith Lords taking out all of the Jedi. Of course, the Jedi sit on their ass and do nothing. -
Rewriting the Prequels Poll I:
Posted 5 Jul 2004
I'm running a series of polls to see what the general consensus is what SW fans expected from the prequels.
Oh, crap... I forgot to put in age 12-15 -
Prequel Ships have no "meat."
Posted 24 Jun 2004
Just to add my quick gripe, especially looking at the little ship on that German Insider cover---why are all of the ships so little? Everything is so little in the Prequels? Well, I mean... The pod-racers seem small to me. The bongo-sub was small. The speeder on Coruscant seems...truncated. The Naboo fighters are small. Even the Queen's ship seemed small, and the droid ships... small. Obi-Wan's "Jedi Fighter" was small. I mean, where are the engines for crying out loud!!?? I'd expect a little more girth or "meat" to these ships.
OT ships were big and awesome and like a muscle car from the '50's.
Maybe it's just how they're shot. I mean, the X-wings seemed real, and large, and... whole, complete... material! Even the Tie-fighters seem bigger than any of the single-fighter crafts. Does this make sense?
My Information
- Member Title:
- Henchman
- Age:
- Age Unknown
- Birthday:
- Birthday Unknown
- Gender
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me