Chefelf.com Night Life: Larry Bernard - Viewing Profile

Jump to content

Larry Bernard's Profile User Rating: -----

Larry Bernard's Photo
Reputation: 0 Neutral
Group:
Junior Members
Active Posts:
4 (0 per day)
Most Active In:
Star Wars Fan Convention (4 posts)
Joined:
21-April 06
Profile Views:
3,350
Last Active:
User is offline May 01 2006 12:51 PM
Currently:
Offline

Previous Fields

How did you find the site?:
reasons to hate episode III (which were to short)
Country:
United States
Icon   Larry Bernard has not set their status

  1. About Me
  2. Topics

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: Reason 17

    Posted 21 Apr 2006

    QUOTE (Jejef Thgaron @ Apr 21 2006, 06:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    I'm calling a DELETED scene NOT part of the FILM. It doesn't matter what kind of deleted scene we refer to, it is DELETED. PERIOD. It is not included anywhere in between the TITLE SCREEN, and the END OF THE CREDITS, which means it ISN'T IN THE FILM. We have already established the fact that 'deleted' means 'taken out' six times. The Greedo scene in question is a systemic anomaly inherent to the DVD's programming.

    Ergo, vis-a-vis, concordantly, close your legs because your breath stinks.



    Yes it does matter it matters greatly

    1) A creative "dead end"

    it shows lucas had no intention of putting it in the film

    2) "we gotta cut something"

    he did and greedo drew the short straw.

    If its #1 your point is relevant

    if its #2 your point is irrelivent.

    if it is #2 the criticism of baby star wars is valid

    if its #1 your challenge to the critique has a point

  2. In Topic: 91 Reasons to Hate Episode III

    Posted 21 Apr 2006

    If only they didn't sleep in the clone training class

    "How to defeat ewoks"

    none of this would have happened

  3. In Topic: Reason 17

    Posted 21 Apr 2006

    I must paraphrase from Calculon

    "This thread is so stupid it's given me cancer"

    Hi I am a newb here so don't mind me for a moment while i step in here at this thread which makes me believe their is no merciful god

    "Greedo is not in the film"

    Ok we're in a film where we see Hey R2 and 3p0 are togther when Darth Vader is a little sprat

    furst of all the "Wald" being confused for Greedo is going to happen. The fact his name is included wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaay in the credits which only ubernerds (no offense) would see proves that it was something left to the minds of you the viewer

    yep it was a confusion that would have happened easily but their is a much more important point

    that entire scene was utterly useless. I could remove that whole seen and not improve or harm the movie in anyway.

    His being greedo or not, is irrelivent. What is much more signifigant is that scene should never have existed

    Further more your calling a deleted scene not part of the film depends on what kind of deleted scene your talking about

    "Just friends" divides them into deleted and "alternate" scenes. If the deleted scene was an alternate scene george lucas said "damn this is really horrible" then you would have a point. But if it is a scene george would have added if he could have squeezed 2 more minutes into the films run time then no you don't

    Its clear from the Deleted Scene that if George had his druthers Greedo would have been in TPM

    thus making your point jariten rather foolish. Lucas intended to include Greedo which makes the point 17 comment about "Star Wars babies" entirely valid

    thus STFU and stop waisting electrons

My Information

Member Title:
New Cop
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender

Contact Information

E-mail:
Private