[Simperin' Fool]

Exactly.

Also, for whatever reason, my dog sometimes nibbles grass. It's the truth: I seen 'im do it. I think that's a fairly common thing, too, so I'm sure that means something.

[Cobnat]

Well actually bears are omnivores but they definitely eat raw red meat. Which Snakeypoo here says isn't possible.

I thought bears ate mammals and fish.

[Simperin' Fool]

They do, but Timothy Treadwell was mauled and devoured by a grizzly. I'm pretty sure humans count as red meat.

This post has been edited by Simperin' Fool: 19 February 2008 - 10:18 AM

[Spoon Poetic]

Bears eat raw red meat and raw white meat; and they eat berries, grass, nuts, seeds, etc. I'm still waiting on Snake to come tell me how bears don't really exist - the communalist governments made them up in a conspiracy to try to keep people out of the woods - and that's why his definition of "omnivore" is still correct.

This post has been edited by Spoon Poetic: 19 February 2008 - 10:46 AM

[Simperin' Fool]

"They're really just communalists in fursuits."

[barend]

Omnivores cannot eat plants or raw red meat (mammals).
Omnivores can eat fruits, vegetables and raw white meat (fish, reptiles, amphibians and birds).

Carnivores cannot eat fruits, vegetables or plants.
Carnivores can eat raw red meat and raw white meat.

Herbivores cannot eat raw red meat or raw white meat.
Herbivores can eat plants, fruits and vegetables.



This picture expresses my feelings towards your ignorance and arrogance.

I am a fat bastard
I eat plants, vegetables, raw red meat, cooked red meat, cooked white meat, fruit, raw fish, cooked fish, and very recently for the first time ate a fucking bunny.

Herbivores eat Herbs
Carnivores eat Carnies
Omnivors eat fucking everything


but I draw the line at raw white meat. Only do that if your want to vomit and squirt liquid shit with a feaver and epilepsi for 36 hours straight.


EDIT: oh, and it's not that Carnivores CAN'T eat vegetables, it's just that can't be arsed. A starving Lion would pick blueberries in an emergency if he didn't live in africa.

This post has been edited by barend: 19 February 2008 - 06:05 PM

[Slade]

You're so ignorant and arrogant for asserting the appropriate definition of omnivore is correct, Spoon. And don't forget, your quest for fairness is GAY!

Omnivores are capable of digesting and usually require nutrients from both plant and animal matter. Raw or not isn't very relevant, except cooking meat eliminates many diseases that may be present in the meat. Even if we lacked the enzymes to digest raw red meat (which I'm pretty sure we do not lack), we'd still be omnivores.

Either way, all of this "should" stuff is utter nonsense. We're humans. We'll adapt and do what we like. You could just as easily say that humans shouldn't fly because we don't have wings. This is almost as absurd, but makes the slightest bit more sense because it is not based misuse of a definition, like Snake's argument.

This post has been edited by Slade: 19 February 2008 - 06:18 PM

[barend]

Humans don't adapt.


We pave over.