[Gobbler]

Yah, alright. Forget about that confused-stuff. You're not confused. You're psychotic.

[Otal Nimrodi]

So you are hiding behind leet by the few words.

That was not 1337.

OMG 73l-l l)33p5y(l-l3r 7l-l47 w45 1337!!!!111oneoneoneshiftoneeleventyblue.

[Deepsycher]

That was not 1337.

OMG 73l-l l)33p5y(l-l3r 7l-l47 w45 1337!!!!111oneoneoneshiftoneeleventyblue.

"OMG tel-l l)eepsy(l-ler tl-lat was Elite!!!!llloneoneoneshiftoneeleventyblue."

Right in front, okay what is it if you say it is not?
Sounds to me like another form of leet.

Yah, alright. Forget about that confused-stuff. You're not confused. You're psychotic.

There could be many types of sanity, also perceived on both ends, I see some from time to time. Another kind of race or people does not make them psychotic, yes they may appear to be.

Malaying on vacant debit
Lavishing at the fret
Credit beyond the relaying
Threatening to go flashing

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 15 April 2006 - 05:05 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

Another kind of race or people does not make them psychotic, yes they may appear to be.

CONDEMNED BY YOUR OWN WORDS, DEEPSYCHER!

ANOTHER RACE! You ARE another race... A ROBOT!

[Deepsycher]

CONDEMNED BY YOUR OWN WORDS, DEEPSYCHER!

ANOTHER RACE! You ARE another race... A ROBOT!

I mean a type of people not robots who lived else where, something I keep on having to repeat to you as if you are a "robot" of numbness from another dimension of "numbnut."

Supposedly you are condemned by your own numbness as a numbnut and a follower.
Could be that you had too many "Floppydiscuits" to eat.
In reflection (Also from this you ARE "De old numbnut" from a race of the Discuit followers.)
Seems the urgency to this by using capital letter on most of the letters.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 15 April 2006 - 06:51 PM

[J m HofMarN]

So then, That the "people" cannot to "understand what you're saying" is it perhaps that we are uninformed?

"Oh no!" It appears as though, that I have contracted the "Deepsycheritis" I, would be pleased if someone could insert a bullet into my "head".

[Chyld]

*burns everyone with a deodrent can and a lighter*

Come on! Get out with your talking inane nonsense! God damnit, why can't I do anything moddy in this forum?

Now, phone bills. And start... now.

[Deepsycher]

So then, That the "people" cannot to "understand what you're saying" is it perhaps that we are uninformed?

"Oh no!" It appears as though, that I have contracted the "Deepsycheritis" I, would be pleased if someone could insert a bullet into my "head".

Could be of some information but I am here.

(It does say a high level on the "CoffMonitor," so I have to be aware of your coughs.)

*burns everyone with a deodrent can and a lighter*

Come on! Get out with your talking inane nonsense! God damnit, why can't I do anything moddy in this forum?

Now, phone bills. And start... now.

It may be like nonsense to you, without the right understand, but I would not have put much time thinking and writing it if it was nonsense and had no meaning.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 16 April 2006 - 04:10 AM

[Otal Nimrodi]

(It does say a high level on the "CoffMonitor," so I have to be aware of your coughs.)

Please, STOP insulting people by their names. Say... Would it be possible for someone ban him for these? Just a question...

This post has been edited by Otal Nimrodi: 16 April 2006 - 09:54 AM

[Deepsycher]

Please, STOP insulting people by their names. Say... Would it be possible for someone ban him for these? Just a question...

"Oh no!" It appears as though, that I have contracted the "Deepsycheritis" I, would be pleased if someone could insert a bullet into my "head".

Actually I do not see it as an insult, I see it as making use out of names.
Personally I think that banning people is not always the answer.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 16 April 2006 - 10:02 AM

[Otal Nimrodi]

No. I suppose you're right.

Not ALWAYS the answer.

[Deepsycher]

No. I suppose you're right.

Not ALWAYS the answer.

Yes, just because I may have some oppositions on people does not mean I should ignore or asked to have them banned.

Anyway to the subject, what might be silly is the amount of money the company wastes in court if they insist with their billing mistake.

Shares want to gamble
Propaganda was at ample
Scrambled so they dared
Spangler at the memoranda

[J m HofMarN]

WHAT? What in the name of the ever loving fuck biscuit is Egon Spangler doing with a memoranda about ample propaganda?

No. I suppose you're right.

Not ALWAYS the answer.

Yes, just because I may have some oppositions on people does not mean I should ignore or asked to have them banned.

Jeese Otal, I can't believe you're suggesting banning me and Gobbler and Floppy Disk and Chyld just for having a few small problems with DS. I'm all kinds of offended now. I know you were, because who else could your statement have possibly been refering to?

[Deepsycher]

WHAT? What in the name of the ever loving fuck biscuit is Egon Spangler doing with a memoranda about ample propaganda?
Jeese Otal, I can't believe you're suggesting banning me and Gobbler and Floppy Disk and Chyld just for having a few small problems with DS. I'm all kinds of offended now. I know you were, because who else could your statement have possibly been refering to?

"Problems with DS?"

So you are saying that I am a "problem?"
To you I maybe and you three maybe to me. Then that could be the same not getting anywhere.

"Failing to see that the problem is inbetween and not one end or the other."
That could be what is causing another problem, anybody looking at other people as "problems."

"WHAT? What in the name of the ever loving fuck biscuit is Egon Spangler doing with a memoranda about ample propaganda?"

Wording it like that does not make the intended sense, in the previous form I worded it does have meaning embedded otherwise I would not have written it.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 16 April 2006 - 12:53 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

Jeese Otal, I can't believe you're suggesting banning me and Gobbler and Floppy Disk and Chyld just for having a few small problems with DS. I'm all kinds of offended now. I know you were, because who else could your statement have possibly been refering to?

Yes, because I want MYSELF banned too you know.