[Deepsycher]

Oh no... SHUT UP!

Is this an exp​ression your self?
So you are telling yourself to "shut up?"

[Otal Nimrodi]

No.

[Deepsycher]

No.

So you are telling me to "shut up?"

If so:

Not the way to express to me to be quite politely and in this case I do not see the reason to. I was not even talking loud with explanation marks.

Sarcastically "How nice, coming from a numbnut, now try saying that with a long mobile phone lisp." One sided "Perhaps in connection to the large bill except it might not be accidental and not their mistake in your case for when it does happen."

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 14 April 2006 - 04:53 PM

[Kirby]

Ok so 806,400,000,000,000.01 (gotta love the once cent) -ringgit equates to about $218 trillion USD. Thats a stupid amount of money, infact so stupid that *Does some checking*: that it could pay off the US national debt (lest than 9 trillion) 25 times, That it could pay off the the that it's five time every countries' in the world's GDP (40$ Trillion USD). If the entire world stopped clothing and feeding itself and were devoted to paying off this guy's phone bill, it would take 5 years.

I so want to see this go to court. It would make for a very interesting read.

[Deepsycher]

Well if it does go to court, how can it make them look or will it change their reputation after.

Yes, that could show the care and attention they take in collecting billing information and checking the readouts.

But it becomes their attention when they want the money and are so quick to threaten and notify the debt collectors.

Could that be classed as breaking a law on private property if the debt collection agency forced themselves in, especially when it is a mistake?

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 14 April 2006 - 05:10 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

Sarcastically "How nice, coming from a numbnut, now try saying that with a long mobile phone lisp." One sided "

That was not sarcasm.

[Deepsycher]

That was not sarcasm.

Ah so you do not see it as sarcasm, okay I won't name it. There are correct ways of being polite: Neither is going to work such as telling people to "shut up."

Anyway an issue about debt collection: If I break an entry on private land, claiming something that I think is owed to me, will that be classed as breaking an entry and theft?

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 14 April 2006 - 05:18 PM

[J m HofMarN]

No matter what the answer will always be no. For the love of God, DS, no.

[Otal Nimrodi]

For the love of God, Montressor.

[SimeSublime]

"I do not understand what that person is saying so he must be stupid

No, he doesn't understand how you can't understand anything, so he think's your're stupid.

edit: And if you have to explain a joke, it isn't funny. All jokes lose their humour when explained.

This post has been edited by SimeSublime: 15 April 2006 - 06:37 AM

[Deepsycher]

No matter what the answer will always be no. For the love of God, DS, no.

Okay, I will look until I find a yes then.

No, he doesn't understand how you can't understand anything, so he think's your're stupid.

edit: And if you have to explain a joke, it isn't funny. All jokes lose their humour when explained.

So are you saying that I cannot understand anything?
If so that is ignorant as well, I do hold some understand, just need to find how workings here. So are you saying I can make up an insulting joke and not explain it and to make the person feel insulted?

Yes I could think he is stupid and others from my perception for a good amount of reasons as some stated above. I do not usually express it onto people in that way but instead I use constructive criticism.
Just makes them looks "stupid" for calling someone "stupid."

Remembering:

(1) The smashed or broken USB wireless network dongle, was it?
(2) Someone who was wanting to be "col" or "cool."

Well from perception wise simple not to think of someone as "stupid" when they could be themselves.

If you call this a "crappy news desk" how I can be called "stupid" when it already is "crappy?"
As for not having a sensible discussion on the half way line here.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 15 April 2006 - 07:52 AM

[Otal Nimrodi]

OMGROFLMAO I HAVE BEEN TEH N00BITIZED BY THAT POST!

[Deepsycher]

OMGROFLMAO I HAVE BEEN TEH N00BITIZED BY THAT POST!

Maybe your understanding lacks somewhere here, so you "negatively" state it on "nonsense" wording like the ignorant people I see do, who are wanting to stay like that.

So you are hiding behind leet by the few words.

I see an image "Of vandals damaging objects outside and swearing forcefully as an attempt to tell people to be quiet." Especially those who run up huge phone bills including mobiles, just curious on what type of reaction will be next for that, if it ever happened. (Not your reaction of course.)

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 15 April 2006 - 12:43 PM

[Chyld]

(1) The smashed or broken USB wireless network dongle, was it?

What on earth has my inability to not break things got to do with a huge phone bill, now?

[Deepsycher]

What on earth has my inability to not break things got to do with a huge phone bill, now?

Yes, wasn't that stupidity?

What on earth has your inability to see what I am saying got to do with saying that I am confused?
Or assuming that I was going to ask about inflexible ideas such as involving pizzas.

I ask and wonder why, does not mean I am confused.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 15 April 2006 - 03:14 PM