[Deepsycher]

That's the cutest thing someone's ever said to me.

(Could someone fill me in on what a "saveloy" is? I feel like I've dug up a major educational deficit here...)

Okay it is another name for a sausage, I think with mechanically separated meat.

[J m HofMarN]

Do not know what you mean there as I never heard of a ... Geneva Conventions.

That explains a lot...

[Deepsycher]

That explains a lot...

A lot of what?

Just because I do not know what that is, don't just assume a whole "lot" of information you do not know. It could be the opposite, in me stating "that explains a lot" because I know something you don't for whatever reason. Simply does not make me any greater or lesser than anyone else in "explaining a lot."

Your actions explains "a lot" also as well depending on what is gained from it, usually limited to:
"Some things I know that you may not know."
"Some things you may know that I do not."

The sarcasm I am picking here sounds like a typical "sissy girl" in a "lower class" area from a primary or secondary school who says "That explains a lot..." upon verbal abuse. I do not mean every one but I hear them say that term "a lot". The male people usually express their abuse physically all the same as if it would make the diffence they want.

I could say "that explains a lot" as you fail here to explain the joke you know that I do not, without even asking you state a comment "That explains a lot..." personally knowing it is either to yourself or a sarcastic remark made above as guessing information about people which may not correct, "in which I see an image of you being attached to a leash."

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 08 April 2006 - 10:29 PM

[J m HofMarN]

The Geneva conventions are what keep humans from using strange speeches to break down the will of test subjects, or creating liquid metal people, or harvesting electricity from the human body which, combined with a form of fusion, gives them all the energy they need.

[Deepsycher]

The Geneva conventions are what keep humans from using strange speeches to break down the will of test subjects, or creating liquid metal people, or harvesting electricity from the human body which, combined with a form of fusion, gives them all the energy they need.

Also now looking I see it is to do with treatment of the soldiers in the war, defined by four conventions and now human rights.

[Otal Nimrodi]

Yes. And I believe that they banned you from use in warfare. You're an unaccepted form of torture.

This post has been edited by Otal Nimrodi: 09 April 2006 - 07:55 AM

[Deepsycher]

Forgetting that I do not kill, in another reality "sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind."
If you see me as an unaccepted form of torture or cannot accept that it is none intentional, you may have to get used to it, just to the similar way as being tagged now as a sky bot. Maybe you can state why so I can try to change that.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 09 April 2006 - 08:06 AM

[Mirithorn]

If you either admitted to using an online translator, spontaneously started making sense or took some sort of online English course that would help.

[Otal Nimrodi]

Or were disconnected.

[Deepsycher]

If you either admitted to using an online translator, spontaneously started making sense or took some sort of online English course that would help.

Nope I do not admit to using a translator because I can only speak English. I did English courses years ago. If I was using a translator I do not think my wording will be accurate. What is natural can be defined differently on both sides. What makes sense to me may not make sense to you, and the opposite way round in some situations or maybe you are too busy laughing like a "child" but not seeing the sense in what I am talking about.

Or were disconnected.

Quite typical of you and the followers, for comparing me to weak "robot" terminology as before. For example, "Of course you need top performing hardware, to help you translate."

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 09 April 2006 - 01:59 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

For... I tire of this fellow, alas, if only he would insult someone, then I'd have grounds to ask for banning.

[Deepsycher]

That depends on what you define as an "insult," sometimes "you get for what you give."

Call me a "robot," you may get similar back in another form, for whatever you want to call it, no regrets to that.

Simply insulting people is not what I am intending here.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 09 April 2006 - 02:52 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

That's the problem.

[Deepsycher]

That's the problem.

I admit I am not perfect but did not mean to insult anyone from my point of view in response to the robot tagging, perhaps that is why you need people on top to control you by a leash.

This post has been edited by Deepsycher: 09 April 2006 - 03:00 PM

[Otal Nimrodi]

Umm... Dissed?