Chefelf.com Night Life: nameless babies - Chefelf.com Night Life

Jump to content

Star Wars Fan Convention

Page 1 of 1

nameless babies

#1 User is offline   Travis Mays Icon

  • New Cop
  • Group: Junior Members
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 09-December 05
  • Country:United States

Posted 08 January 2006 - 03:57 PM

I was just thinking today, why even reveal the twins' names at the end of ROTS and where they end up before episode IV? We know they're Luke and Leia, but if Lucas really intends the trilogy to be watched in order 1-6, then those who haven't seen 4-6 will already know Leia is Luke's sister and ruin the reveal. If nothing had been said we'd only know about Luke and would wonder what ever happened to Luke's twin, and then aha, a big reveal in ROTJ. But now there's no surprise.
0

#2 User is offline   Darth Player Icon

  • Soothsayer
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 622
  • Joined: 10-June 05
  • Country:United States

Posted 08 January 2006 - 04:16 PM

Good point, but if your reasoning were extended, Lucas couldn't write the whole of the PT due to pitdalls like this, which may not have been a bad thing considering what we got. The big assumption by him and pretty much everyone is that nearly everyone who had the ability to do so saw the OT or had ample chance to do so before the first of the PT movies was released. What was presented in the PT was supposed to make us see the events in the OT in a whole new light, but it didn't i9n my opinion. We know even less about Anakin/Vader, Yoda, and Obi Wan then when we saw them for the "last" time at the end of ROTJ, other than the fact that they're presented as complete doofuses by the last frame of the PT.
0

#3 User is offline   Storm Icon

  • Level Boss
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 374
  • Joined: 25-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Country:Canada

Posted 08 January 2006 - 06:52 PM

You forgot to mention that we also know that Darth Vader is Luke's father. Not much of a mystery anymore.
0

#4 User is offline   jariten Icon

  • making the nature scene
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,845
  • Joined: 18-August 04
  • Location:in the bin
  • Country:Nothing Selected

Posted 08 January 2006 - 07:16 PM

come on. Even without the naming scene it would be perfectly obvious who was who to an audience who hadnt seen 4, 5 and 6 first.
0

#5 User is offline   Sailor Abbey Icon

  • Queen of the Harpies
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,122
  • Joined: 29-March 05
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:the land of Huskies
  • Interests:Defending the forces of evil from the whiney forces of good; spreading awareness about violence and its ability to solve all problems - from the very smallest to the very stupid…est…; sticking up for the little guy, as long as the little guy shares my point of view or is willing to convert in exchange for some ‘sticking up for’; and of course, plotting world domination and putting and end to reality tv once and for all. <br /><br />Oh, and beautiful women.
  • Country:United States

Posted 14 January 2006 - 10:20 PM

It’d have been cooler if we found out she had triplets. At least we would be treated to a scene we didn’t already see coming.
0

#6 User is offline   Despondent Icon

  • Think for yourself
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,684
  • Joined: 31-October 03
  • Location:a long time ago
  • Interests:Laughter. Louis pups. Percussion. What binds us. Bicycling, Tennis.
  • Country:United States

Posted 15 January 2006 - 02:28 PM

Or if the babies had died at birth like their mother. Something else for Ben to explain in Episode 6....

And the Emp's ESB dialogue would be made more accurate.
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  • Decrease editor size
  • Increase editor size