[Zatoichi]

I think that it even had the most buttons on it out of the basic controllers.

does research buttons include triggers
N-64
10 buttons, a d-pad, and a joystick
Playstation
10 buttons and a d-pad
Dreamcast
7 buttons, a d-pad, and a joystick
X-box
10 buttons, a d-pad, and 2 joysticks
Playstation 2
11 buttons (I don't think the analog one should count), a d-pad, and 2 joysticks
Gamecube
7 buttons, a d-pad, and 2 joysticks

Oops, I was wrong

This post has been edited by Zatoichi: 26 September 2005 - 03:04 PM

[floppydisk]

Some games I actually want to play with a D-pad, just for how it feels. Sadly, most every game now is done with a joystick.

I don't have a PS2 and I always wanted one because there were a lot of PS2 exlcusive games with great reviews and it also had a lot of third-party support. The bad thing about the PS3? That horrible boomerang controller.

The Revolution looks so awesome to me and I think it's better than the PS3, but sadly it won't get a lot of third-party support.

And I don't really need a 360. Most games are ported to the PC and I can go to a friend's house to play Halo.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

First: I bet the PS3 controller is comfortable as fuck, even if it looks dumb.

Second: If you look at the facts, I think you'd realize that PS3 will probably be better than the Revolution, unless Nintendo gets thier asses in gear.

Halo and Halo 2 were both very over rated by everyone, and you're all forgetting how much these systems are going to cost. Last I heard, ps3 was going to be betwixt 400 and 500$ US, dunno about the xBox, but I'm sure it's going to be up there.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Nnoooo... Halo 1 is great fun in single and multi-player. Halo 2 had an iffy campaign, but the multiplayer is great if you have a bunch of friends that you invite. The only bad thing about it is that you have to have lots of friends, cause the Live game hosting sucks. It automatically puts you in a game type, but you only get to pick the general category, like "Multiplayer" or "Free-for-all". You don't know the map or weapons till you join the game. If anything, that should be why it's overrated.

And we hit post 100000...!

Click the little arrow to go to it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Edit: Not quite, but almost

This post has been edited by floppydisk: 26 September 2005 - 04:20 PM

[Zatoichi]

Weren't we promised a lot of other stuff in Halo 2 as well, stuff that we never got?

[SithAvenger]

Wasn't Halo 2 supposed to be on Earth?

Only 2 levels were on Earth.

[floppydisk]

Yeah, then when we play the covenant, we just waste more covenant. When I first saw the convenant hand coming onto the screen after the cutscene I almost wet myself. I wanted to fight the humans!

[EwokHunter]

At least I have voted, ''Revolution''
The innovation is all about, and PS3 is cool!!!
360 is the same thing!!!
Get out Halo and PD: Zero from 360, which other good game is going to have 360?

[Zatoichi]

Elder Scrolls, Perfect Dark, there are more.

This post has been edited by Zatoichi: 26 September 2005 - 09:12 PM

[floppydisk]

Again, Elder Scrolls IV is on PC...

(and my prediction is that PD will be like UT04, just that it's two-three years late, and Halo 3 will be, well, Halo 3)

[SithAvenger]

I wanted to fight the humans!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Me too, Floppy, me too.

At least that black sargeant was funny...

[Zatoichi]

Well, if you can't afford a good comp.

[floppydisk]

Eeh, yeah, I guess. But I never buy anything anyways. I'm going to try to get a job so I can buy my own compy.

[EwokHunter]

Ummm....now I think that the PS3 was a better idea
But Revolution is revolutionary.
But Final Fantasy is...Final Fantasy

[floppydisk]

The revolution is gimmicky, not revolutionary.

And what is it with you and FVII? I'm sure you've already played it, right? Is there something extra?

[floppydisk]

Arr, double post...

This post has been edited by floppydisk: 26 September 2005 - 09:41 PM

[Zatoichi]