[Kirby]

Hey, whether or not she was a horrible bitch who needs her kid taken away from her so he won't be involed in anymore get-rich-quick schemes, Micheal still molested that child. They're both at fault.

[floppydisk]

I don't know wether or not he did it, and I really don't care. But just because he's found innocient doesn't mean that he is innocient. It just means that there wasn't enough evidence to prove that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

[Slade]

And if you can't find enough evidence to prove someone guilty, then you have to assume he's innocent.

It's just not fair, otherwise. "Better the guilty go free than the innocent subject to easy arrest."

However, I concur. MEAT!

[Vampsmasher]

bet Batman would kick his ass...

[floppydisk]

Anyone would kick MJ's ass. Even Spongebob.

[Heccubus]

Hey now, Spongebob can be quite the rough customer. You think Patrick was always that stupid? Nuh-uh. Spongebob roughed him up once and he was left with permanent brain damage. True story.

[Rhubarb]

Am I the only person who didn't give a fuck about whether he was guilty or not and just wanted the trial to get the fuck over with so he wouldn't keep clogging my news feeds?

[floppydisk]

No, I also belong to that category.

[Rhubarb]

You goddamn liar. You were theorising along with everyone else. You just want to sound cool.

[floppydisk]

I was making a statement about America's legal system. I don't give a fuck what happens to MJ.

[Rhubarb]

Liars go to Hell.

[floppydisk]

Whatever. It's clear that I'm not going to be able to convince you.

[Rhubarb]

8th Circle, 10th pouch of Malebolge. That's where you're going.

[J m HofMarN]

I never watched the news so I was immune, I just read. And why is it that everyone completely ignored my point and continued to just randomly state that he definately did it. Consider this:

If a parent is willing to do something horrible like let their child get molested for money, then wouldnt they be willing to accuse an innocent man for money if no molestation had occured?

Come on, it's simple logic and its more than enough to create reasonable doubt. There is NO hard evidence. The only evidence is circumstantial and the only eyewitnesses are CRIMINALS (the main witness outside the family was a kidnapper himself who was facing trial in Nevada, the mother was an extortionist, a falsifier of information and a liar who had 2 times before lied to get money and even lied under oath.

Jay Leno's testimony revealed that the accuser had tried to extract money from him likely under the coaching of his mother, which proves that the accuser had performed a similiar racket before.

No hard evidence, no reliable witnesses. Moreover Jackson does not fit the profile of a sex offender, either mentally or physically. Shit the kid was what thirteen? You think a thirteen year old wouldn't stand decent odds against Michael Jackson I'll take that bet any day of the week its at least 50/50.

The acquital was right, but Jackson is still up to his neck in debt and the DA, Tom Sneedon, is still fucking with him constantly, so hey at least you people who like to judge others based on their looks can have the satisfaction of knowing the guy is fawkin miserable.

[Jesus Christ]

SOUNDS LIKE JM HAVE MJ BONER???