Sign In
Register
Help
Add Reply
QUOTE
U.S. investigates tabloid’s Saddam photos
More photos published Saturday, including one of ‘Chemical Ali'
BAGHDAD, Iraq - A British tabloid published more revealing photographs of Saddam Hussein in U.S. custody on Saturday, a day after it ran a front-page picture of the former Iraqi leader naked except for his underwear.
The international Red Cross, which is responsible for monitoring prisoners of war and detainees, said the photographs violated Saddam’s right to privacy. The U.S. military condemned the publication and ordered an investigation of how the pictures were leaked to The Sun.
Saturday’s pictures included one of Saddam seen through barbed wire wearing a white robe-like garment, and another of Ali Hassan al-Majid, better known as “Chemical Ali,” in a bathrobe and holding a towel.
The photos were certain to offend Arab sensibilities and heap more scorn on an American image already tarnished by the prisoner abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib prison and allegations by Newsweek, later retracted, about desecration of the Quran at the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
U.S., British military under scrutiny
Saddam’s chief lawyer, Ziad al-Khasawneh, said the photos “add to acts that are practiced against the Iraqi people.” He said he would sue the newspaper “and everyone who helped in showing these pictures.”
Giovanni de Stefano, Saddam's lawyer in Britain, told NBC News that "a potential criminal offence has alledgedly been committed under Section 13 of the Geneva Convention 1949.
"It has been repeated today. Our request is for the Director of Public Prosecution and Secretary of State to take action."
When asked if he felt the photos had been leaked by British soldiers, he replied: "Not excluded. There are 2 alternatives: U.S. soldiers and British soldiers were guarding him. The U.S. guards have denied any involvement and have launched an inquiry. The British guards have said nothing."
"That leads us to believe.... there are presumptions in law... you no longer have a right to silence," he told NBC News on Saturday.
However, The Sun said Friday the photos were provided by a U.S. military official it did not identify who hoped their release would deal a blow to Iraq’s insurgency. Managing editor Graham Dudman told The Associated Press that the newspaper paid “a small sum” for the photos. He would not elaborate except to say it was more than 500 British pounds, which is about $900.
The New York Post, which is also owned by Murdoch, also published the photos on Friday.
U.S. vows full probe
The U.S. military in Baghdad said the publication of the photos violated U.S. military guidelines “and possibly Geneva Convention guidelines for the humane treatment of detained individuals.”
A spokesman, Staff Sgt. Don Dees, said the military would question the troops responsible for Saddam.
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said U.S. military officials in Iraq believe the photos are “dated” — perhaps more than one year old, although no specific date has been established.
“This is something that should not have happened,” Whitman said.
Army Maj. Flora Lee, Multinational Forces spokeswoman in Baghdad, said the photos could have been from January 2004 to April 2004, “based on the background of the photos and appearance of him.”
Images taken from surveillance cameras?
Saddam, who was captured in December 2003, has been jailed at a complex near Baghdad airport named Camp Cropper, which holds 110 high-profile detainees.
Lee would not confirm an NBC News report citing Pentagon sources that Saddam was moved to a different cell in another location and that the photos were taken by 24-hour surveillance cameras.
Aside from U.S. soldiers, the only others with access to Saddam are his legal team, prosecuting judge Raed Johyee and the International Committee for the Red Cross, which monitors his treatment for compliance with the Geneva Conventions.
“Taking and using photographs of him is clearly forbidden,” ICRC Middle East spokeswoman Dorothea Krimitsas said. U.S. forces are obliged to “preserve the privacy of the detainee.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7917696/ (there's plenty more, its worth looking)
More photos published Saturday, including one of ‘Chemical Ali'
BAGHDAD, Iraq - A British tabloid published more revealing photographs of Saddam Hussein in U.S. custody on Saturday, a day after it ran a front-page picture of the former Iraqi leader naked except for his underwear.
The international Red Cross, which is responsible for monitoring prisoners of war and detainees, said the photographs violated Saddam’s right to privacy. The U.S. military condemned the publication and ordered an investigation of how the pictures were leaked to The Sun.
Saturday’s pictures included one of Saddam seen through barbed wire wearing a white robe-like garment, and another of Ali Hassan al-Majid, better known as “Chemical Ali,” in a bathrobe and holding a towel.
The photos were certain to offend Arab sensibilities and heap more scorn on an American image already tarnished by the prisoner abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib prison and allegations by Newsweek, later retracted, about desecration of the Quran at the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
U.S., British military under scrutiny
Saddam’s chief lawyer, Ziad al-Khasawneh, said the photos “add to acts that are practiced against the Iraqi people.” He said he would sue the newspaper “and everyone who helped in showing these pictures.”
Giovanni de Stefano, Saddam's lawyer in Britain, told NBC News that "a potential criminal offence has alledgedly been committed under Section 13 of the Geneva Convention 1949.
"It has been repeated today. Our request is for the Director of Public Prosecution and Secretary of State to take action."
When asked if he felt the photos had been leaked by British soldiers, he replied: "Not excluded. There are 2 alternatives: U.S. soldiers and British soldiers were guarding him. The U.S. guards have denied any involvement and have launched an inquiry. The British guards have said nothing."
"That leads us to believe.... there are presumptions in law... you no longer have a right to silence," he told NBC News on Saturday.
However, The Sun said Friday the photos were provided by a U.S. military official it did not identify who hoped their release would deal a blow to Iraq’s insurgency. Managing editor Graham Dudman told The Associated Press that the newspaper paid “a small sum” for the photos. He would not elaborate except to say it was more than 500 British pounds, which is about $900.
The New York Post, which is also owned by Murdoch, also published the photos on Friday.
U.S. vows full probe
The U.S. military in Baghdad said the publication of the photos violated U.S. military guidelines “and possibly Geneva Convention guidelines for the humane treatment of detained individuals.”
A spokesman, Staff Sgt. Don Dees, said the military would question the troops responsible for Saddam.
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said U.S. military officials in Iraq believe the photos are “dated” — perhaps more than one year old, although no specific date has been established.
“This is something that should not have happened,” Whitman said.
Army Maj. Flora Lee, Multinational Forces spokeswoman in Baghdad, said the photos could have been from January 2004 to April 2004, “based on the background of the photos and appearance of him.”
Images taken from surveillance cameras?
Saddam, who was captured in December 2003, has been jailed at a complex near Baghdad airport named Camp Cropper, which holds 110 high-profile detainees.
Lee would not confirm an NBC News report citing Pentagon sources that Saddam was moved to a different cell in another location and that the photos were taken by 24-hour surveillance cameras.
Aside from U.S. soldiers, the only others with access to Saddam are his legal team, prosecuting judge Raed Johyee and the International Committee for the Red Cross, which monitors his treatment for compliance with the Geneva Conventions.
“Taking and using photographs of him is clearly forbidden,” ICRC Middle East spokeswoman Dorothea Krimitsas said. U.S. forces are obliged to “preserve the privacy of the detainee.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7917696/ (there's plenty more, its worth looking)
You know, I thought The Sun was designed for spreading pictures of naked ladies. Shows how much has changed since I went to university then...
Thanks to JM Hofmarn for this!
MultiQuote
