[civilian_number_two]

In Paul's time homosexuality was largely a product of lust.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Nonsense. Religions have changed, yes, but people haven't. I know you're referring to Roman orgies, but in Paul's time as now most people were not in the Roman senate and most fags blew one another in private and fought and died and were stoned together for love. And Christians were persecuted along with them, and now they command the most powerful army on Earth and they are the most heretical and hypocritical persecutors that ever there were.

Fuck them all, and Happy Easter.

[Slade]

Easter...? With the Mr. Hoppy Bunny who brings me candy?! Woo hoo! I totally forgot.

Alternatively: Give the straight people back names like Lance and Bruce, rainbows and unicorns, and TLC, and then I'll talk.

Still another alternate reply: King Kong died for your sins. Mu?

[Kirby]

Now there's proof that Satan exists in the world. White rap.

I dunno, I think it's pretty funny, as seen here

Oh and Click here or you will regret it for the rest of your life.

Sorry for Hijacking the thread but Cyzypoo just gave me the perfect open for this.

Now we return you to your regularly schedualed bitching.

WWGD (what would Godzilla do)

[Dr Lecter]

WWJD (What Would Jesus Do). LMFAO I'm listening to his song and the funny thing is it aint that bad.

This post has been edited by Dr Lecter: 31 March 2005 - 05:57 AM

[Slade]

We Want Jack Daniels you mean! And I forgot about SA and the (super) Kansas City Worldskippers! I've been missing out.

[Jordan]

Christians were persecuted along with them, and now they command the most powerful army on Earth and they are the most heretical and hypocritical persecutors that ever there were.

You mean communist China with it's PLA? Christians aren't persecutors, corporations and commusim took that title 50 years ago.

This post has been edited by Jordan: 31 March 2005 - 10:03 PM

[Dr Lecter]

*Looks at Iraq, and Vietnam wars* *Looks at America's unparrelled military*
You know who else had an unparrelled military before the war and brainwashed their people into thinking all the wars were self defence. That's right kids, our old friend Adolf Hitler.

This post has been edited by Dr Lecter: 01 April 2005 - 07:03 AM

[Slade]

Can't we find other analogys, people? Sheesh. The doctorine of a self-centered militaristic corporatist soverign nation does not always imply fascism or Naziism or what have you! There's also dictatorship and monarchy, and oligarchy. And I'll bet there's more!

So much sensationalism and crys of Hitler. Everybody always forgets poor Joe Stalin. The last treatment he got was me putting his face on a paper airplane and leaving it in a random classroom in high school.

[Dr Lecter]

Can't we find other analogys, people? Sheesh. The doctorine of a self-centered militaristic corporatist soverign nation does not always imply fascism or Naziism or what have you! There's also dictatorship and monarchy, and oligarchy. And I'll bet there's more!

Damn straight it doesn't always, Hitler was an anti-capitailist (Don't believe me? Look up some of his economic policies). I think the irony of the Stalin-Hitler thing is that they are always remembered as being deometrically opposed to each other. Stalin was no communist, and Hitler was no right wing capitialist. Infact by modern day standards Hitler is the symbol of liberalism, so forget being the founder of nazism, he's the founder of modern day liberalism.

This post has been edited by Dr Lecter: 01 April 2005 - 12:02 PM

[J m HofMarN]

No, I'm afraid he's not, since modern day liberals preach acceptance. And if its damn straight with you than find another comparison to make- for instance, Victorian England.

[Slade]

Yeah. Ever read Gullver's Travels? At points it's hard to tell it wasn't written with present day America in mind.

[Dr Lecter]

Have a look at this biased website:
http://constitutiona...tist/index.html

Take special attention to the sections:
Hitler's Anti-Tobacco Campaign
Hitler's Animal Rights Campaign
Hitler's Euthanasia Initiative
Hitler Pro-Abortion

In conclusion: Hitler had all the political agenda of most modern day liberals, but he used aggression to get what he wanted. He was willing to kill people that did not agree with his views, and was willing to kill to keep his ideals. Most modern liberal would be pro-choice (like Hitler), pro-animal rights (not strictly but like Hilter), anti-smoking (like Hitler) and pro-euthanasia (not strictly but like Hitler). Hence it is fair to say, that Hitler and Nazis, were violent leftists. The kind of people we need in power now: To stop this facsism in which we live. I believe that not only if Hitler was around now, he would be fighting America on the invasion of Iraq, he would probably be invading America as we speak. Reason? Bush is infact deometrically oppossed to Hitler, but he shares the willingness to use violence to protect his views and his oil. Not to forget Hitler's anti-capitialist beliefs, and Bush's well, capitialist beliefs. Assuming this is true, in modern day history, Hitler would infact be a modern day hero and revolutionary, assuming he didn't kill any Jews. Although I am willing to accept that this sounds crazy and thus I doubt anyone will believe it.

[Obbah]

For the gaydebate:
If you believe in the Bible and want to live after it, ok. I am also sure of that you just want people well by denying them their rights, at least that part's fine with the me. But I just want to remind you of that little story about a commoner and a farisée, perhaps christians ought to inform people rather than enforce thier ideals on them?

For the Hitlerdebate:
Hitler was neither capitalist nor communist, he was officially a national socialist (a draconic utopia for us, you people, yes I mean you: RAUS!) and practically an anarchist in his thoughts about economics, although he clearly had a social liberal campaign before the elections and a fascist economy while ruling, in other words: He wanted his blonde aryans to go back to some prehistoric kind of farming economy which would be good for the natural selection, he promised the workers and farmers to confiscate jewish property (perhaps not THAT social LIBERALl after all...) for their use and giving them social security by raised taxes and his ruling lead to an economy based on cooperation between his totalitarian state and coprorations.

Just because he agreed to some liberal ideas that exist today doesn't mean he was liberal, the foundation of liberalism, to move with the times and being open to a relative view of morals he wasn't found of. Instead he had nothing against enforcing his morals on peole, something that is justificated by, that's right, conservatism.

For the debate about about God:
Come on! Comment what I wrote about the need for a good, that is a rather basic discussion I think.

[Dr Lecter]

This is crap I'll post what I meant to say later

This post has been edited by Dr Lecter: 02 April 2005 - 06:07 PM

[Hannibal]

Every thread I look in is about nazis, and in each instance, its Hofmarn or somebody else who has brought up the debate, not I. I think its very interesting how unfactual these debates are, and how Hofmarn uses every form of irrational tactic known to mankind. If anybody isn't sick of Hofmarn yet, I would be very suprised. After all, I've only post a few times this week, while Hofmarn makes a new record of posting 908,324,234 posts with my name in it. (Even when I haven't posted in the entire thread.)

It seems that Hofmarn cannot exist, nor make his arguments without me. He misses me when I'm gone to the point where he MUST post endlessly about me...its flattering I guess...or sickening.