QUOTE (Jordan @ Jan 2 2004, 04:12 PM)
They did ask for Christ to be crucified. The followers of christ did not have high places in society. The pharises were the powerful religous men of the time, they and their followers wanted Christ dead. Pontius Pilate did not even want to kill Christ, but in fear of a great riot he sentenced him to death.
....
How this causes anti semitisim is beyond me. God chose jews to be his messanger race, christ was a jew, and the gospels were written by jews. The bible does not preach anti semitism. It's just another way to undermine the bible and pass it as hate literature.
Yes, the characters representing the Jews in the Bible stories did ask for Jesus to be crucified. They were also under the sway of the Pharisees, the "powerful religious men of the time." Fact is, though, that the Pharisees were not a significant group in Jesus's day. They rose to prominence after the destruction of the temple, and from them we can draw a direct line to the current Rabbinic tradition. In Jesus's time it would have been temple high priests and such who held power. But who knows how much they disagreed with jesus? In Mark, the earliest gospel, there's not a lot of talk between Jesus and anybody. It's in Matthew he's preaching to crowds and by Luke he's arguing with Pharisees all the time, calling them white-washed tombs and such like. The Phariseees are important players in the gospels of Matthew and Luke because they were important players in the years in which those gospels were written.
Fact is, we'll probably never know why Jesus was crucified, or whether Pontius Pilate cared about it or not. What we do know is that Matthew upped the power of the Pharisees to equal their importance in his own time, some 40 years after the death of Jesus. We also know that the Gospels were written in Greek, and that therefore their primary audience was probably not Hebrews. A really significant point to make on this is that from time to time Matthew includes an expression in Aramaic, followed by a Greek translation. He wouldn't have done this had he been writing for Jews.
....
How this adds up to modern anti-semitism I really can't say. But there's no denying a rejection of Judaism in faviour of Christianity. And by the fourth gospel John doesn't even make a distinction between Pharisee, Saducee, or Sanhedrin. He just says that pilate went out to ask "The Jews" what ought to be done with Jesus. There are elite secular Jews in John who accept jesus, so John seems to put the burden of guilt on the Jewish religious types, but he doesn't go so far as to distinguish them any further than that. in Acts, Paul and Peter they tell a story about having had a vision that denounced all of the Jewish dietary laws in favour of a more Roman-friendly diet. By the time of the Gideon Bible Society in the twentieth century, we have Christian Bibles that publish only the "New Testament" and the Psalms, as though to say it's acceptable to just ignore everything of the Jewish Bible except for the Psalms (that "Lord is my shepherd" one is so pretty). So maybe that had something to do with it too.
Anyway, people don't need a big excuse to kill people and steal their stuff. Anti-semitics often bring up Jesus in their rants, and there's no way you haven't heard Jews referred to as "Christ killers." So it's something Christians themselves are doing, not some slam against the Bible made up by people trying to make Christianity look bad.
"I had a lot of different ideas. At one point, Luke, Leia and Ben were all going to be little people, and we did screen tests to see if we could do that." -George Lucas, in STAR WARS: the Annotated Screenplays (p197).