Alec Guinness question To Obi-Wan or NOT to Obi-Wan
#1
Posted 07 January 2005 - 10:20 AM
Ironically, George Lucas, Harrison Ford and pretty much everyone else who worked with Guinness on Star Wars have always said nice things about him, saying that he was a great actor, always professional and always working hard (Ford says Guinness actually helped him find an apartment to stay at when he arrived in England for the studio filming). This leads some to theorize that he didn't hate the films so much as he hated the fandom, that he had a fairly wide range of films under his belt and it aggravated him that the generation that followed him only knew him for a role in what he saw as an experimental film.
The question is, despite his seemingly flawless portrayal of Obi-Wan Kenobi, should someone else have played Obi-Wan instead of Alec Guinness? And if so, who? (Toshiro Mifune maybe?)
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.
#2
Posted 07 January 2005 - 10:53 AM
Alec Guiness didn't like Star Wars much. I think he may even have hated it. He said something like that in his autobiography. And I guess, why would he like it? It's a flick for children and young adults. I don't think many people of his age would have been really interested in it.
#3
Posted 07 January 2005 - 05:11 PM
I can't think of anyone to replace Guiness, he's simply too good. But who knows, there is bound to be more special editions...
#4
Posted 07 January 2005 - 11:47 PM
As for the death of Kenobi, I had always thought it was Marcia Lucas who had suggested Lucas kill off Kenobi because he was just...useless... at the end of the film; which was a brilliant choice...
But it makes me wonder how much Marcia had helped hammer the script together with suggestions? I mean, she was the closest one to Lucas when he was writing it. I mean, just compare the script of ANH to the script of TPM. Did the same guy write them? Maybe Marcia wrote ANH... Heh! Conspiracy time. No, seriously, if she had, she would've sued his ass long ago, and we wouldn't have the prequels... damn.
Battle for the Galaxy--read the "other Star Wars"
All I know is I haven't seen the real prequels yet.
#6
Posted 08 January 2005 - 10:13 AM
Remember, the first thing he made after their divorce was Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.
So the moment she was gone, he went from the pinnacle of his achievements to the lowest depths he ever fell to.
And yes, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is far worse than the prequels. The prequels are stupid, this is true. However, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is nasty and truly horrible as well.
#7
Posted 08 January 2005 - 11:11 AM
Remember, the first thing he made after their divorce was Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.
So the moment she was gone, he went from the pinnacle of his achievements to the lowest depths he ever fell to.
And yes, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is far worse than the prequels. The prequels are stupid, this is true. However, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is nasty and truly horrible as well.
I read that the reason "Temple of Doom" came out so nasty was because George Lucas was trying to "purge" himself of the frustrations he was feeling going through the divorce. Director Steven Spielberg has admitted in retrospect that the film went too far (I read Harrison Ford went the same way).
However, I cannot and WILL NOT believe that TOD is worse than the prequels. I know its a bad film but there's no way its worse than TPM and AOTC.
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.
#9
Posted 08 January 2005 - 07:50 PM
I prefer TOD over the PT's. Sorry Despondent. You don't like it because of Capshaw, right? I can understand that, but Lloyd, Portman and Hayden are pure poison next to her.
Battle for the Galaxy--read the "other Star Wars"
All I know is I haven't seen the real prequels yet.
#10
Posted 09 January 2005 - 12:14 AM
So, I'll say this again. The Temple of Doom and the prequels are all stupid movies. But The Temple of Doom is nasty and horrible as well.
A nasty, unpleasant stupid film is always worse than a merely stupid film.
#11
Posted 09 January 2005 - 06:03 AM
Crappiest Villains Ever, courtesy of Something Awful.com
Even though Mola Ram made it into the list I don't find The Temple of Doom quite as insulting as the PT.
#13
Posted 09 January 2005 - 01:26 PM
I prefer TOD over the PT's. Sorry Despondent. You don't like it because of Capshaw, right? I can understand that, but Lloyd, Portman and Hayden are pure poison next to her.
No, no, no. They all suck, each in their charming, get-out-of-here ways.
My point was that in 1977 when Star Wars came out, the general public was instantly proclaiming it an all-time classic and picture of the year.
Still, the prequel people can't explain why the TPM or AOTC are better than TOD.
#14
Posted 10 January 2005 - 08:39 AM
(The Fifth Element), 8. The Architect (The Matrix: Reloaded), 7. The Merovingian (The Matrix: Reloaded). I havne't seen any of the other movies but I can only assume that those are good pics as well.
God damn, I hate the Merovingian.
Buy the New LittleHorse CD, Strangers in the Valley!
CD Baby | iTunes | LittleHorse - Flight of the Bumblebee Video
Chefelf on: Twitter | friendfeed | Jaiku | Bitstrips | Muxtape | Mento | MySpace | Flickr | YouTube | LibraryThing
#15
Posted 10 January 2005 - 10:45 AM
(The Fifth Element), 8. The Architect (The Matrix: Reloaded), 7. The Merovingian (The Matrix: Reloaded). I havne't seen any of the other movies but I can only assume that those are good pics as well.
God damn, I hate the Merovingian.
I think we ALL hate the Merovingian, an effeminate, smugly self-satisfying prick if there ever was one (what I would have given to watch him get his ass kicked). The Architect and Donald Sutherland's "Phone Booth Caller" character also suck. They should add the Joss Ackland villain from "Lethal Weapon 2".
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.