QUOTE (jariten @ Dec 28 2004, 09:01 PM)
so its better to murder in cold blood for making a tactical mistake than it is to kill after your tortured to death mother dies in your arms?
No, no one is saying it's 'better'! The point I'm trying to make about Vader and Anakin is not just their moral character, but which of them would be the more pleasant (or rather, less unpleasant) character to have to associate with. As far as I'm concerned there's not much between them, but on balance I still think Vader has the edge.
QUOTE
what should Anakin have done? forgiven them? walked away? if you had Anakins power I mean. Perhaps if Obi Wan wasn't holding him back his power wouldve been controlled and meeted out in other, more productive ways instead of boiling over and coming to the fore in one horrific, explosive event which sends Anakin right over the edge.
For God's sake, we never actually see Obi-Wan 'holding him back' in any way whatsoever! Yes, Anakin
claims that this is the case, but he never even demonstrates these exceptional powers he's supposed to have - what he appears to mean by 'holding back' is the occasional lecture or ticking-off whenever he puts his foot in his mouth or does something stupid, childish or dangerous. And this is sufficient to enrage him so much that he's capable of becoming a mass murderer?
Even if there was any evidence Obi-Wan
was really 'holding him back' in some way, it would hardly be enough to justify this kind of pent-up rage. I've had teachers who've picked on me and pissed me off to an unbelievable degree, but even as a 12-year-old I was capable of controlling these emotions to a greater degree than Anakin. I certainly didn't store up all my anger to be released years later in a fit of murderous fury!
QUOTE
Anakins actions were in no way forgivable, but they were at least fathomable. we can understand why he did it. It took a momentous event. Vader murders what is presumably a perfectly capable commander after he makes one mistake! Is this intelligence? Is this 'self restraint'? and to those of you who just said "yes", do you honestly believe that? they won the battle with no problems, and presumably few casualties even after Ozzels 'mistake'.
Ever heard the phrase '
pour encourager les autres'? Vader does these things to make it clear to his other commanders that they'd better not make the same kind of mistake. Yes, only a complete psychopath could act in this way, but it's a calculated action done for a purpose - not the result of a temper tantrum. And various military commanders
have been known to act this way in real life - I believe the phrase I quoted refers to Napoleon.
QUOTE
The fact is, Anakin only became dangerous on justified grounds, Vaders behavour was pointless, and hense he would be far more dangerous. as long as you dont torture any of Anakins relations, you'll be ok. who knows when you'll be murdered by Vader?
Sentence by sentence: However justified Anakin's anger at his mother's killers may be, there was nothing remotely justifiable about killing innocent women and children. Vader's behaviour was not pointless, as I explained above. Anakin may not actually kill you unless you torture any of his relations (though God help you if you happen to belong to the same village as anyone who did), but he's still entirely capable of making your life a misery. And as I said before, if you avoid doing anything that's likely to upset Vader (and it should be fairly clear what kind of thing would upset him), you're unlikely to be murdered. Unless you work for him, in which case frankly you deserve all you get.
Paladin, about your last point - I don't think the Jedi ever even found out about what Anakin did. (Yes, you would have thought they'd sense this kind of murderous anger in him, but the PT Jedi seem to be too stupid to sense anything whatsoever.) It certainly appears that Padme didn't tell anyone - which, as far as I'm concerned, makes her largely responsible for Anakin's subsequent crimes and the destruction of the Jedi and the Republic. However horrific Anakin's actions, you could always argue that since he clearly has the emotional intelligence of a pre-teen, he probably couldn't help himself; Padme, however, has no such excuse.