GL approves new Indy Script
#1
Posted 01 June 2005 - 06:53 AM
GL-"Give Indy two whips...yeah, two is better than one"
"...and when he loses his fedora down the mine shaft I want a deep glottal 'NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO'".
"...and I want Shortround to be back, but he's a midget and never grew, because I love giving work to midgets and dwarves".
Oh, the indignity a screenwriter must feel when the author of ROTS picks over his lines.
#2
Posted 01 June 2005 - 07:10 AM
This post has been edited by Darth Dick: 01 June 2005 - 07:12 AM
#3
Posted 01 June 2005 - 08:28 AM
I can't wait to see this one.
Buy the New LittleHorse CD, Strangers in the Valley!
CD Baby | iTunes | LittleHorse - Flight of the Bumblebee Video
Chefelf on: Twitter | friendfeed | Jaiku | Bitstrips | Muxtape | Mento | MySpace | Flickr | YouTube | LibraryThing
#5
Posted 01 June 2005 - 09:42 AM
The third episode deviated too much with that ancient Templar character, and Connery was a distraction. The first two were extraordinary!
#6
Posted 01 June 2005 - 11:13 AM
I couldn't agree more. Sean Connery was too much of a distraction ; and offered nothing more than cheap humour and bland lines. I was too scared to say anything about him in my last post, since a lot of people I know actually LIKED his character.
EDIT - I forgot a smiley. Oh me, oh my! lol
This post has been edited by looktothesky: 01 June 2005 - 11:13 AM
#8
Posted 02 June 2005 - 10:43 AM
Con's-Lucas still has the final say....And I dont think the world is clamouring to see Indiana Jones in his last crude days. Ford is too old, and I cringe to think about even seeing one CGI shot of Indy since I doubt Ford can do most of the stunts anymore
#9
Posted 03 June 2005 - 09:29 PM
I agree with Michel Orla on this one.
We should start a petition to ban Indy 4.
I'd like a qui-gon jinn please with an obi-wan to go.
#10
Posted 03 June 2005 - 10:04 PM
Con's-Lucas still has the final say....And I dont think the world is clamouring to see Indiana Jones in his last crude days. Ford is too old, and I cringe to think about even seeing one CGI shot of Indy since I doubt Ford can do most of the stunts anymore
Actually.. I don't think Lucas has final say. Apparently Ford has to approve it still, and he is the pickiest of the three. Also Speilberg got one of the writers he works with to take the latest stab at it. SO I think it should be good.
As for the fedora down the mine shaft... haven't you learnd from the films, that the hat never gets lost... NEVER! Even after falling off a cliff, he still has it come back to him. It is a constant thing in the movies, and they have said so.
#11
Posted 08 June 2005 - 01:15 AM
INDIANA JONES and the OPAL OF THE MER-MAN PRINCE
As stupid as it sounds, it fits right in with The Phantom Menance and Attack of the Clones for stupidest titles G.L. could think of. Without the Nazi's in this one I wonder if there will be heros on both sides...
#13
Posted 08 June 2005 - 10:29 PM
Like Doom.. could be.. .Monsters On Mars.. or Ghosts of Mars 2: Electric Boogaloo
(hehe.. electric boogaloo... was in a sort of discussion about that earlier today.. hehe)
#14
Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:37 AM
Ford's the one who said he likes the title But I do hope it's change. That still begs the question, why the hell is Indy going after something like the opal of a mer-man. I sure hope neither the title or the movie itself has nothing to do with that. The lost city of Atlantis was the best idea for Indy 4 when it was kicking around
There will be a Silent Hill movie Day-um, that's gonna be sweet
#15
Posted 09 June 2005 - 11:59 AM
It's due for release in 2006 I believe. I also live in the city (Brantford) where the town scenes were filmed, since the downtown area is a spitting image of Silent Hill. I also managed to walk through the movie set, but I didn't have a camera on me.
My little sister has a collection of the grey fuzz and hay they used to cover the ground, though.