[Hannibal]

" we might, y know, comment on this "



HAHAHAHAH!


Comment?

Comment?

What for hoffie, and the rest?

When have you ever 'commented?'

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!

It seems all your posts are "redicule"


It actually makes more sense :

1. To not view Hannibal's Threads
2. Not read Hannibal's threads(So far thats one out of two)
3. To post threads about Hannibal and mock him(Two out of three)
4. Go back to sleep
5. Kill Youself
6. Join the Nazi Party
7. Join the Communist Party
8. Post nothing, read at own leisure

Rather than fill up the forums, i believe i've done good by Chefelf and put all "my crap" into this one thread.

You don't like to read? Don't like this thread? Don't like to look at pics I've selected to go with this thread? Go look at porn.

If you have a working brain, some intelligence and creativity, then view this thread for what it is. Some of it funny, some of its stupid, some of its scary, and every bit of it is supposed to be exactly those things.

[SimeSublime]

I liked the pictures. Some were funny, some were tragic. They meshed well. I was only saddned to see no pictures from Fallout And as for the Bush/Hitler theory, that's old news. I remember reading a long article on it before the election.

This post has been edited by SimeSublime: 03 December 2004 - 05:27 AM

[Chyld]

I thought it was common sense, personally.

Problem is, I'm too dense to deal with such a volume of prose...

[Slade]

Yeah, nobody's saying you're insane on this one, Hannibal. When you write a college-like thesis on George Lucas and compare him to Nazis, perhaps, but countless comparisons have been made alluding to the Bush regime's decent into dictatorship. Hell, I just did it in this last sentence with the word regime. At least wait until people start insulting you before going on the defensive offensive.

With the coal thing, you sound like you're condemning the research simply because the Nazis researched it. We can't be biased against scientific progress based on the originator. If the coal is converted using the fresh corpses of Jews, babies, and puppies, I could see it.

And what you're saying is that neither the Nazis nor the defense department think that Humanity as a race isn't an efficient enough killing machine? Somehow I don't think the people in charge of the governments actually bother to see what their handiwork does...

That DARPA image - What about that portion of Saudi Arabia the All Seeing Eye Beam doesn't reach? :-P

Jordan - The people are fighting because they dislike a force occupying their country and selling all of its businesses to foreign powers. This is turning into a debate thread...

Edit: Spelling.

This post has been edited by Slade: 03 December 2004 - 12:45 PM

[J m HofMarN]

Hannibal- I was truly trying to offer some constructive criticism. I was rather enjoying the discussion here and then all those articles happened. It would have been a lot more fun if they'd been fed into the discussion one by one so that we might discuss them individually.

Let's play hangman. I already have one started: C_ncise

I've used all of these letters so far: ABCDEFGHIJKLMN PQRSTUVWXYZ

Slade- that's a good point. I really doubt they'd create technology that could make men into supersoldiers. They're more interested into creating submarines to fight underwater terrorists. As Edward Longshanks said in Braveheart: "Send in the Irish. Arrows cost money, men cost nothing."

[Slade]

No, I was saying that we're effecient enough at killing without the need of supersoldiers. I didn't mean for the validity of the claims to be discussed by me at all. I wouldn't be very surprised if numerous governments were researching such a program. Were it 1945-1988, all it would have taken was the rumor that the USSR was forming a supersoldier program to get the US in on it. That may have happened and the program didn't stop...