Why legalize assault weapons?
#136
Posted 02 June 2008 - 12:35 PM
Man, what part of Australia you from, South Central?
Quote
#137
Posted 04 June 2008 - 05:03 AM
Man, what part of Australia you from, South Central?
Far east suburbia but I'm originally from the inner city. What about you? It says you are from Iraq, I can only assume that is accurate.
This post has been edited by Deucaon: 04 June 2008 - 05:04 AM
-Jimmy McTavern, 1938.
#138
Posted 04 June 2008 - 12:39 PM
Also, I'm not keyed up on this, but I don't think even inner city Australia can concievably be that bad.
Quote
#139
Posted 04 June 2008 - 03:22 PM
Because what else am I supposed to do with all these bullets?
"Maybe artists shouldn't talk about their art."
"Well kids, I guess your father isn't a hermaphrodite."
"Izzy! enough with the rabid smootching!!"
#140
Posted 05 June 2008 - 02:40 AM
Also, I'm not keyed up on this, but I don't think even inner city Australia can concievably be that bad.
Why would I have a gun... in AUSTRALIA? Its your country that's all fucked up and needs everyone to be armed... no offence.
-Jimmy McTavern, 1938.
#141
Posted 05 June 2008 - 01:25 PM
*strokes AK-47*
Even if they take away mi babi I will still have the SVT-40 to hold and cherish... maybe I could even modify it to take AK clips... yes... I can see it now... the future will be an interesting period of time.
I dont know, but you sure make it sound like you have two guns....... in AUSTRALIA!
I... see. First of all, yes, Michael Jackson is pop king of sick fucking country. But that doesn't mean that everyone having a kalashnikov will magically fix everything.
Quote
#142
Posted 05 June 2008 - 06:32 PM
This post has been edited by Dr Lecter: 05 June 2008 - 06:33 PM
#143
Posted 05 June 2008 - 11:39 PM
I see. So you are adamantly arguing for a fantasy solution to a fantasy problem. That is, the need for automatic weapons to stem the tide of assault-weapon-having-home invaders. And you make these informed and urgent claims from half a world away. Yeah, I'd go to Europe, but there's all those terrorists, so maybe I better not.
#144
Posted 06 June 2008 - 03:13 AM
#145
Posted 06 June 2008 - 04:46 AM
It was a joke I made... IN AUSTRALIA!
I don't know why everyone would need a famous weapons designer in the first place.
From what? Hiroshima?
What the hell have you been watching? Everyone knows all terrorists are either Russian or Chinese who almost always attack American targets because they hate freedom and there is no freedom in Russia or China... which makes them jealous or something.
I can only assume you are from Mexico in which case you probably would feel safer in the US. If you are Canadian... you have a lot to think aboot. What else can I say, eh?
-Jimmy McTavern, 1938.
#146
Posted 06 June 2008 - 12:21 PM
Ah. Ok I see. You were talking about figuratively owning figurative guns during a speculative debate about what guns you would want to have in the event that you were in the US and the country fit your speculations..........
What?
Quote
#147
Posted 06 June 2008 - 10:39 PM
What?
How can you not get that joke?
-Jimmy McTavern, 1938.
#148
Posted 07 June 2008 - 02:24 AM
First of all, Civ enquired on that page about what kind of gun you had for home and family protection. Then later you began to go on about what guns you own and how to maintenance and modify them and how you did not want anyone taking them.
This is ironic because you have exhibited knowledge of armed combat (or at least the terms applying thereto) and have expressed a belief that people need automatic guns to defend their homes. Oh wait. No, I'm sorry, that's not irony at all. Indeed it's a sound leap of logic that you have a bunch of guns in your house, since you say people (or, at least, every third person) should have a bunch of guns in their house.
That's a pretty awful joke.
It would be like me talking about how cool it is to hunt endangered species, then jabbering about the California Condor mounted on my wall, and then wondering why no one, including the local game warden, thought it was a joke.
This post has been edited by J m HofMarN: 07 June 2008 - 02:25 AM
Quote
#149
Posted 07 June 2008 - 04:27 AM
First of all, Civ enquired on that page about what kind of gun you had for home and family protection. Then later you began to go on about what guns you own and how to maintenance and modify them and how you did not want anyone taking them.
This is ironic because you have exhibited knowledge of armed combat (or at least the terms applying thereto) and have expressed a belief that people need automatic guns to defend their homes. Oh wait. No, I'm sorry, that's not irony at all. Indeed it's a sound leap of logic that you have a bunch of guns in your house, since you say people (or, at least, every third person) should have a bunch of guns in their house.
That's a pretty awful joke.
It would be like me talking about how cool it is to hunt endangered species, then jabbering about the California Condor mounted on my wall, and then wondering why no one, including the local game warden, thought it was a joke.
1. I don't think most civilians know the basics of urban warfare let alone how to modify and maintain Soviet weaponry so having an abundance of weapons in ones home doesn't make one an expert in such things.
2. Assault rifles aren't legal in Australia. I haven't checked but I don't think semi automatic rifles are either.
3. I stated that every 3rd person in America having an assault rifle in their house would discourage home invasions.
This post has been edited by Deucaon: 07 June 2008 - 04:28 AM
-Jimmy McTavern, 1938.
#150
Posted 07 June 2008 - 01:38 PM
PS: Dont think that just because the debate has devolved into one big joke, that you get off easy. That one big joke is squarely aimed at your idea of total gun rights for those living in the savage waste lands of America.
This post has been edited by J m HofMarN: 07 June 2008 - 01:40 PM
Quote