007 James Bond films Are they serious?
#32
Posted 14 October 2004 - 08:56 PM
You must mean "Slappers Only!" Yeah, all chicks, slapppers only. High times.
Also, throwing knives for the finesse players. you have to play low health for that one.
------------
I don't like Robbie Williams, and I don't even know who Peter townsend is. I think Bond has to be a famous actor, since it's such a huge series. I think that's what hurt Lazenby and Dalton. Even Roger Moore, suck that he did, came off THE SAINT and had a household name.
Of course, if PT is a famous actor and I just don't know him, let me know. Nothing came up in imdb. Is he a musician?
#34
Posted 15 October 2004 - 01:03 AM
If I may voice my opinion as one of the few ladies here, I’d say Hugh Jackman for new Bond. Maybe it will be the first film he is given a decent hairstyle for a change. But would he be able to pull off English accent?
But please no Ben Affleck! I can’t stand the self-righteous git.
#35
Posted 15 October 2004 - 01:37 AM
Of course no Affleck. The actor must either be Scottish or English. No Americans allowed. MAYBE an Australian.
This post has been edited by Jordan: 15 October 2004 - 01:38 AM
#36
Posted 15 October 2004 - 04:33 AM
Actually, they did this on purpose for legal reasons. There were some complications with intellectual property, and as such couldn't take anything directly from Goldeneye. Hence, all the classic levels and weapons were slightly renamed so as people would know what they refer to, but they wouldn't have to pay royalties. Funny thing is I don't remember who they were supposed to pay royalties to.
JM's official press secretary, scientific advisor, diplomat and apparent antagonist?
#37
Posted 15 October 2004 - 11:42 AM
Ben Affleck would suck ass; I'd rather see Adam Sandler.
Hug Jackman, I don't like. If I wanted an American I'd want John Cusack.
But: it just occured to me Sting could possibly pull it off, if only for one or two films.
I saw Sting and Annie Lennox the other night in concert. God damn that Annie Lennox can sing. How you kids can listen to that Britney Spears I don't know.
Interesting note about PD. I'll buy that, since the rest of the game is really professional, and not apparently made by the sort of folks who could goof like that.
#38
Posted 15 October 2004 - 03:45 PM
Hugh Jackman is too bulky. Bond should be a tall slender man with upper class mannerisims.
And it's true. Bond must be at the very least 40 years of age.
Bond films are great for older actors to get one final shot at fame!
This post has been edited by Jordan: 15 October 2004 - 03:45 PM
#39
Posted 16 October 2004 - 10:58 AM
Movies: I think it would be fairly obvious after watching a few that they are nothing more than constant mindless eye candy for the most part. I find all of the ones I've seen rather dull, long, and slow. Yahtzee over at Fully Ramblomatic did some excellent articles concerning Bond in the past...
#40
Posted 16 October 2004 - 10:51 PM
Well, so far you've accepted all the Bonds but Pierce, who is Irish. And I say he did fine in some dumb movies (but it's been pointed out often enough, they're all dumb).
Another Brit (a Welshman, actually) who could do it well would be Christian Bale, but of course he breaks the "James Bond cannot be younger than I am" rule, so we'll have to wait until that rule expires (about 15 years or so).
By then people will have forgotten that he's Batman.
Yes, mulitplayer Goldeneye > PD, but PD had better single-player missions. Add to which co-operative and counter-operative options, while gimicky, did enhance the repeat playability a touch.
One thing PD had over Goldeneye, in spades, is that you can play multiplayer arena all by yourself, with bots as opponents. That PD made good use of the expanded memory by making the game more interesting, where a lot of other designers might have pushed for enhanced graphics and sound.
#41
Posted 17 October 2004 - 01:59 AM
Hugh Jackman's Australian, I belive.
And I actually disliked the option of bots in PD. I mean, its a good idea, but my friend is a bit of a coward and always wanted to play us onto the bots rather then vs each other. I found it got a bit tiring after awhile.
JM's official press secretary, scientific advisor, diplomat and apparent antagonist?
#42
Posted 17 October 2004 - 01:11 PM
Your issue with bots, really, is an issue with your friend, right? With him being a coward and all, and no fun to play with, the sissy girly-pants?
I thought the bots played a tad predictably, but I really liked how the Dark Bots were so freaking excellent and knew the levels so well that playing two humans against two of them in an open map with common weapons (rifles, pistols) meant that you were more or less doomed.
#43
Posted 18 October 2004 - 01:48 AM
The guy who played villian looke like middle-aged shoe salesman or librarian. Not convincing as villian at all.
There was one good line though:
"How is the new software?"
"So full of viruses people will be buying new version for years."
"Good!"
How very true. Especially in view of my recent Windows XP disaster at home
#44
Posted 18 October 2004 - 10:14 AM
JM's official press secretary, scientific advisor, diplomat and apparent antagonist?