Posted 17 October 2004 - 01:31 AM
Er...I'm just going to pretend that that Photoshop paste-up job never happened. (I should be more excited but...well...all I can say is, yuck.)
I'm going to suggest something here that nobody else will like: showing Anakin as a child isn't, ipso facto, a bad idea. I know that there's a general perception, especially among sci-fi fans, that children shouldn't be let within a mile of an SF movie or TV show (witness, for example, the delight with which "Babylon 5" fans greeted J. Michael Straczynski's equation of children with robots and talking animals. A class act, that J. Michael Straczynski.) But good, even great movies, have centered about characters in childhood. Take Francois Truffaut's The 400 Blows, for example; Jean-Pierre Leaud was incredible in that but he was only fifteen years old. Spielberg's Empire of the Sun is fairly well regarded and Christian Bale was only fourteen when he starred in that.
I'm not saying that Episode I should have been about Anakin Skywalker's childhood. As JYAMG has pointed out in his "essential reading", the first appearance of Anakin in the Star Wars backstory is when Obi-Wan meets him, already a "great pilot"--in other words, probably already grown up. (Perhaps Owen knew Anakin when Anakin was younger but there's nothing to show that for certain.) What I am saying is that Episode I could have been about Anakin as a child without necessarily being a sentimental, puerile mess ("Yippee!!")
What really dooms The Phantom Menace in my eyes is that Lucas tried to do too many things at once and did all of them ineptly. If his movie had been entirely about Anakin on Tatooine and his discovery by Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan it might have worked better; instead Lucas has to work in half-assed subplots about this "Trade Federation" we've never heard of and this planet "Naboo" we've no clue about. What the *expletive deleted* was he thinking?