God Any christians on the forums?
#887
Posted 30 January 2006 - 07:19 PM
Ok, I'm lost. Looking like god doesnt give us the right to act like god?
Who says we really look like god. I think we just ended up being the species that nature selected to give opposable thumbs. That having been said... i believe nature IS divine.
#889
Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:50 AM
Edit: Oh fuck that, I guess I do wanna sound rude after all.
This post has been edited by Gobbler: 31 January 2006 - 12:51 AM
Quote
#890
Posted 31 January 2006 - 02:48 AM
Image can also mean something/someone reflecting something/someone... i.e. Personality, Inteligence, Wisdom... etc.
Great Quotes Of The 21st Century/Cobnat gets serious!
Ron Paul At AntiWar.com/A Writing Guild For The Clinically Retarded/Death By Quotes/AntiWar/Early Justin Raimondo articles/In Defense Of Yoshiro Mori By Justin Raimondo/Vox Popoli
Evil Happens/This Is A Knife!/Minorities, too!/
AYBABTU/Che Guevara Action Figure!/Strange Humour
#892
Posted 31 January 2006 - 07:56 AM
While I don't have a bible handy, I would like to point out that somewhere near the first few pages of genesis, god refers to itsef as "we."
God basically comes out and dismisses the idea of monotheism right there.
If were going to start taking stuff in the bible literally, then we cant pick and choose which stuff, just so we can tailor it to our arguements.
#893
Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:08 PM
#894
Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:37 PM
No where else in the old testament (as far as i can remember) is the holy trinity ever mentioned. The concept of such wasnt devised until long after Jesus's death. If I'm not mistaken, it is an invention of the early Catholic Church. People refer to the holy spirit and 'god the father' but never with christ i.e. no holy trinity. All three persons are mentioned in the new testiment, but never as the holy trinity. I'm not 100%sure, but i'm pretty sure.
#895
Posted 31 January 2006 - 12:56 PM
The old testament is not referring to a trinity consisting of God father, God son & God spirit, since the son first joined the club in the new testament. I guess God just felt a little bit cocky at that time.
Anyways, I think the bible's not going to help win any arguments in any case. I mean, just look at it. The 10 Commandments are declared twice in it, if I remember it right. Each time by Mose. The same person who wrote... umm... let's see... somewhere in Mose's fourth book... Numbers, chapter 35, verses 16 and following:
And so on, it basically says that if you dare to fuck up anything, then you're fucked yourself. Big time. And it's an explicit command to kill someone. Flip a few pages and read "Thou shalt not kill". Turn back a few pages and read again. Infinite loops made easy.
I guess that's what's just bound to happen if humans dare to claim to have an understanding of God's will and are stupid enough to jot that crap down.
This post has been edited by Gobbler: 31 January 2006 - 01:03 PM
Quote
#896
Posted 31 January 2006 - 01:42 PM
didnt moses write genesis?
#897
Posted 31 January 2006 - 02:08 PM
I think the bible was writen AFTER Moses.
Great Quotes Of The 21st Century/Cobnat gets serious!
Ron Paul At AntiWar.com/A Writing Guild For The Clinically Retarded/Death By Quotes/AntiWar/Early Justin Raimondo articles/In Defense Of Yoshiro Mori By Justin Raimondo/Vox Popoli
Evil Happens/This Is A Knife!/Minorities, too!/
AYBABTU/Che Guevara Action Figure!/Strange Humour
#898
Posted 31 January 2006 - 02:20 PM
well... technically, the bible wasnt the bible until quite sometime after the time of Christ. Various prophets (including moses) and the like, would write down stories/prophecies/whatever, and call it the word of god... then much later on... some people (don't know what thier editorial qualifications were) decided to pick and choose among the stories and called what they found acceptable "the Old testement."
The new testiment was a collection of scriptures that one of the early popes decided to keep around and call the new testament. Everything that didnt fit the theme or that pope whoever didnt find acceptable to rule and govern the new church, got scrapped. And burned. A lot of scriptures were 'lost' or hidden most likely, and we are still finding them today. The Church doesnt want to recognize that stuff for some reason... probably because it would fuck up a 2000yr old foundation of bullshit thier organization was built on.
#899
Posted 31 January 2006 - 02:29 PM
This post has been edited by Gobbler: 31 January 2006 - 02:34 PM
Quote
#900
Posted 31 January 2006 - 02:37 PM
the scriptures in the new testament... they all quote Jesus as saying this or that, saying various events happend and so on...
these scriptures were written anywhere from 50 to 120 years AFTER Christs death. I can't remember what my mom said to me last week... how the fuck are you going to tell me these people remember Jesus 'exact' word. Thats regoddamndiculous.
Oh but 'Jesus say this' and 'Jesus said that'
... no he didnt. John, Matt and Paul said that. We've all played that stupid telephone game where shit gets all twisted around. Come on now - nature gave us brains for a reason. Lets try to use them....
the scriptures in the new testament... they all quote Jesus as saying this or that, saying various events happend and so on...
these scriptures were written anywhere from 50 to 120 years AFTER Christs death. I can't remember what my mom said to me last week... how the fuck are you going to tell me these people remember Jesus 'exact' word. Thats regoddamndiculous.
Oh but 'Jesus say this' and 'Jesus said that'
... no he didnt. John, Matt and Paul said that. We've all played that stupid telephone game where shit gets all twisted around. Come on now - nature gave us brains for a reason. Lets try to use them....
I mean.. i guess if you honestly believe that stuff - thats all fine and good - but when people start telling you your evil or your going to hell becuase you chose to think it through, thats pretty screwed up.