Ah ok so shes back to being a self loathing capitalist of the current trend. Or is she? I think youve let your guard down prematurely. After all she is a Muslim and all and by your own admission there are only two kinds of Muslims, so if you havent met her how can it be safe to think shes safe?
Since when did I single out Muslims as the only warmongers in the world? I could have sworn I said there were warmongering Americans.
JM: Do you consider it Western to attend a public beheading?
Western culture endorses violence so yes. They still have public executions in America if I am not mistaken. How is seeing someone being hang or electrocuted any worse then seeing someone be beheaded?
JM: So what about the southern churches consent for slavery and KKK activities?
A few racists priests is hardly the consent of the southern churches. Most blacks in the south are protestant. Are you saying that the black protestant church also condones KKK activities? Another example would be some of the Imams in the Middle East. What about their consent to terrorist activities and death squads? Are we to blame all of Islam because of the actions of a few?
Funny, generally when I see a word used in poor context it confuses me, but obviously not you. You see Communalism can mean communal living, which I doubt is the goal of the two socialist parties I mentioned, or it can be a word people throw around in place of communism. Either way you have no place saying that members of the socialist party accidentally joined it and are in actuality following some other ideal. If theyre socialists its fair to assume theyre socialists unless you mean to profess some inane conspiracy theory about how theyve been made to think that by Stalins ghost.
Would you call the system of government the Iroquois, Mohawk, Oneida, Seneca, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Tuscarora had was communism?
Because in most societies the ruling religious majority has a stake in preserving the current status quo or bringing the status quo back to a more conservative state. However this is obvious that to carry out a revolution one must destroy the defenders of the old system that it doesnt need a large statement to make it clear. Thus why anti religion is not a major part of the manifesto.
But religious rule puts money, power and influence into the hands of religious leaders and takes away power from the proletarian class. If that is the case, it takes money, power and influence away from the socialist government.
I used the word communism, yes. That doesnt allow you to change the premise of the debate. Also I havent smoked any mushrooms or LSD lately but I look forward to hearing about your experiences smoking mushrooms.
If you didn’t want to turn this into a debate about communist theory then you shouldn’t have mentioned communism and Cuba.
WHAT? Why? What does that have to do with whether its better to have an official state religion or be a non religious nation?
When a secular revolution sweeps into a country were at least half the population are poor landowners, then civil war happens. Like Spain for instance.
Ah so because they transported stuff through cambodia sometimes they aided the Khmer? I think the US aided them more with their bombing campaigns but thats just me.
The NVA were supplied by China, USSR and North Korea. It had plenty of supplies. The Ho Chi Mihn trial could not be supervised by American forces and most NVA supplies ended up in the hands of VC. This is proven because of actions like the Tet Offensive. Since the bombing of Cambodia by your countrymen didn’t actually extend to all of Cambodia, I don’t think it actually helped or hindered the rise of the Khmer.